Show 19 divisions were: (1) land and water areas (2) community recreation centers and other buildings (3) use and (5) service (4) program participation personnel The points allotted for (6) administration (7) finance the different items in each division totaled one hundred points each but it should not be assumed from this that sections The Included of these divisions were of equal importance in the evaluation was a formula for weighing the various all divisions and arriving at for a city of any size an arbitrary percentage rating 10 H L Hanmer use in Rating scales already in hts study of ratings contended that communities might determine the progress they were making in public recrea- considering three factors: (1) character of the population — separate homes of industrial district tion by first (2) physical characteristics of the neighborhood the amount of free time the people had available after taking into consideration the above and (3) Then factors his based upon five thousand points the : as follows distributed points being 1000 maximum points Land and water areas rating chart was center and other buildings Personnel Program Administration Community Finance 1U Total m “ " ii H ii ii u I' Maximum Points 550 1200 850 400 1000 5000 According “Rating Recreation Systems to Population and Budgets" Recreation Vol 25 December 1931 1 d A L 521 H Hanmer |