Show ATTORNEY R 8 farnsworth FILES instrument defendant glaesmann Gla emann says causes of action are improper united ana are insufficient from saturdays standard tha following instrument was yesterday filed by attorney R S farnsworth in the district court of weber county in which william glasmann Glas aann sued by george halverson for libel demurs to the complaint and says halverson has not cause for action of damage in tha district court of weber county state of utah george halverson plaintiff vs william Glas roann and the standard publishing company a corporation defendants now comes the above named defendant william Glasman nand demurs to the complaint of the plaintiff herein upon the following grounds 1 that dewral causes of action have been improperly united in this in the plaintiffs first cause of action there are joined together three separate and distinct matters to alt 1 a cause of action tor libel charging the plaintiff with bribery of one councilman 2 a cause of action tor libel changing the plaintiff with failure to successfully prosecute a certain person tor murder and 3 a causa of action for libel charging the with being the subject of some ugly rumors that were in circulation which said matters are not only separate and each other but it abelous at all amount individually to a separate cause of action and are not separately stated 2 that in the said plaintiffs first cause of action there Is also joined improperly a cause of action for libel against him in his capacity as an attorney at law with a cause of action tor libel against him in his capacity as a public officer to alt district attorney 3 that there Is also improperly joined to the above and foregoing causes pt action a cause of action tor libel charging the plaintiff with calmi inal libel 4 that the said first cause of action set forth in the plaintiffs complaint Is also ambiguous and tain because it does not allege what was meant or understood by the alleged libelous words since george has been accusing people right and left of bribery some ugly stones have come to our ears we will have to investigate them 5 that said first cause of action set forth in said complaint is also ambiguous and uncertain whether the plaintiff intends to a cause of action for libel charging the plaintiff with intentionally falling to successfully prosecute a certain person tor murder or a cause of action for libel charging the plaintiff with not successfully cess fully prosecuting said person for lack of ability so to do 6 that said farst cause of action is also ambiguous unintelligible and uncertain tor tho reason that portions of the libelous publications alleged to be are omitted from said complaint and that without such omitted portions being inserted therein the meaning of saad alleged libelous article or articles cannot be sufficiently determined 7 that the matter set forth in he said plaintiffs first cause of acion does not state facts sufficient 0 o constitute a cause of action against his defendant 8 that said plaintiffs second causo of acton for libel charging him with unprofessional conduct as an attorney and with having perjured himself as a witness and guilty of trickery and dishonesty and unworthy to hold the office of district attorney on account of his conduct during the conduct of said will case referred to in said complaint Is improperly joined with said cause of action for libel charging the plaintiff with bribery of one councilman and with said cause at action for libe charging the plaintiff with failure to successfully prose suto a certain person tor murder and with said causa of action for libel charging the plaintiff with being the subject of some ugly rumors that were in circulation and with said alleged ause of action for libel charging the plaintiff with criminal libel 9 that said second cause of acion is also ambiguous unintelligible and uncertain tor the reason that por ions of the alleged libelous libe loua lons are omitted from said corn faint and that without such omitted being inserted therein the meaning of said alleged libelous ar acle or articles cannot be sufficiently let 10 that the matter set forth in said plaintiffs second cause of action does not state facts sufficiently to a cause of action as against his defendant i n S farnsworth attorney tor defendant P 0 address and eccles ogden utah |