OCR Text |
Show HAFB Zobis ! Lewis " ,.f ys he is prepared to 'all f, Tyrone 4 " For Base's Correlation ? I I"15 ported ! , Proposal. It is ? Field1 , f,el u! W"11 work 1 - said Mayor : W, 'ar8esl single ' Kensatin :i'f'S;Peple wh ;?Srontheir ',A Pjoperty ilVt andng more i :i " ,or 'he area. 1 ! !:IsTant ,!t-He i; ,rucl")ns V,Sin&s such '"4uce LWoorJs Cross "d nts- residen- y4 tial development must be restricted, according to Air Force spokesmen. The Air Force has been working since the 1950s to restrict development develop-ment south of the runway. THE AIR Force is not prepared to comment on the city's counter proposal, according ac-cording to Arlo Stewart, master planner at the base. The Air Force will ask Congress for money to purchase the clear zone. Layton Planning Commission Commis-sion member David Whitesides explained the proposal to DCOG members (mayors from Davis County Cities). A RESTRICTIVE zone would be established, roughly bordered by Fort Lane on the west. Antelope Drive on the south, the original Air Force boundary line on the east and the clear zone on the north. The second zone would roughly extend 3,000 feet further south to the Layton-East Layton-East Layton city line. The first zone would restrict res-trict the land to agricultural uses and prevent industrial and residentiaj development. The second zone would allow low density residential development on 15,000 square foot lots. THE AIR Force's proposal called for a wider restrictive zone to the east and west, but shorter to the north and south. Industrial and recreational recrea-tional uses are permitted in the Air Force's proposed restrictions. |