OCR Text |
Show i, . ' (9S0DESJ IMSS i n - - - i i the Fourth Judicial District Court he State of Utah in and for Uintah nty before Judge George E. Ballif, uary 15, 1980. the matter of the estate of Richard Hackford and Richard Douglas kford, Richita Marie Hackford, anna Faye Hackford. This matter ie before the court on a petition for wnting in both cases. The court ited the petition. ate of Utah vs. Claude T. Jones, i was the time fixed for passing of ence. The Adult Probation officer irted that Claude T. Jones did not two appointments with the depart-t. depart-t. The court finds that a Bench rant is to be issued and if the defen-; defen-; does not keep his appointment on rsday the 17th of January 1980, the :uted Bench Warrant is to be given ie sheriff and the said defendant is held in the Uintah County Jail un-le un-le report is completed. ate of Utah vs. Mark Haluska. This the time fixed for passing of ence. It is the judgment and sen- ts e of the court that the defendant be ined and imprisoned in the Utah Prison for a period not to exceed years, a fine of ($250) and full tution of $1,550 is to be made. The ndant is placed on probation for a d of two years. The payment of the and restitution is under the super-in super-in of the Adult Probation and ile Dept. The sentence is suspended i the defendant entering an agree-t agree-t with the Adult Probation and ile Dept. and obeying all the condi- the matter of the estate of James d Perry. This matter came before :ourt for a petition for approval of settlement and distribution. The t finds this matter should be con-id con-id to January 29, 1980 until all the owledgement of receipts are in the ite of Utah vs. Brian Beavers. This the time fixed for passing of mce upon the defendant. Due to entence investigation not being )leted, this matter is continued to ary 29, 1980 at 9 a.m. Defendant is fy ed to be present in court. R. Sather, doing business as :r Jewelry vs. James L. Faulkner, matter came before the court on a lit judgment. The court finds the tiff is entitled to a judgment in the Wint of $4,724.25. Exhibit No. 1 is of-and of-and received and is marked Pr;-d to judgment. Attorney fees in mount of $1,000 is granted. - 00 'nal City, Corporation a municipal 9 vs. Ashley Valley Reservoir Comet Com-et al. This matter came before the on a temporary restraining order. :ourt stated that it would be reluc-J( reluc-J( :o grant any order and suggested , ernal City tender the amount ow-v ow-v ' the Canal Companies. rri Freestone vs. Chester stone. This matter came before the on two cases, a temporary order i default divorce. The court grants PS equest that the case be continued nuary 29, 1980 at 9 a.m. lie LaWanna Taylor vs. Larry jox'ie Taylor. Divorce action. Divorce :ed to the plaintiff to become final months after signing and entry. ilie Evonne Rants vs. Samuel Ed-Rants. Ed-Rants. Divorce Action. The Court '"'is the plaintiff a decree of divorce ipproved the stiuplation and pro-settlement. pro-settlement. Child support of $100 nonth per child is awarded. The idant should assume and pay all r incurred in the marriage prior to 3l "ation, assume and pay all costs of lancy, confinement and birth of second child. Judgment in the int of $550 for attorney fees to the tiff and against the defendant, ee to become final three months signing and entry. 0yjrrance D. Eaton vs. Carol Jean i. Divorce action. The ninety day ng period is waived. Court grants ecree of divorce to the plaintiff to ne final three months after sign-nd sign-nd entry. rson Caldwell, Lucille Caldwell, s E. Drollinger, Donna P. Droll-' Droll-' vs. Uintah Basin Grazing Nation, a Utah, nonprofit corpora- This matter came before the court isefl notion to dismiss for failure to pro-e. pro-e. The court finds that a notice to int counsel or appear in person . d be filed. It was agreed upon to 'C8 he notice. ac ircia Ray Terry, County of Moffat X lobert Dale Lambert. This matter s before the court on an order to cause. Counsel for the plaintiff d the defendant was served per-. per-. .ly and requested a bench warrant. f8":ourt grants the request. Order of a n warrant may be issued with the of $75 cash. Returnable the next ind motion after service. Jrron Schofield Hedrick vs. Donald Tt Hedrick. This matter came "e the court on an order to show e. Counsel for the defendant did not ar but, requested a continuance by Jephone call. Continuance was ted subject to conditions listed by Jaintiff 's counsel. This matter will iard February 26, 1980 at 9 a.m. Qt lltalie Roberts, Texas Department luman Resources vs. Arllyn e irts. This matter came before the ' t on an order to show cause. A sup-order sup-order is to be prepared. The defen- , has agreed to pay $75 per month . per child, the support to be paid to the clerk of the court. Nanette Smith vs. Michael Guy Smith. This matter came before the court on a temporary restraining order and an order to show cause. Both the defendant and plaintiff were sworn, testified and examined by both counsel. y The court finds the minor child should be returned to Nanette Smith, mother of said child until this case can be heard on its merits providing the plaintiff does not leave the Vernal area or the State of Utah with said child. A home study from the Family Social Services is requested and the court grants the request. re-quest. Kenneth Ray Freestone vs. Betty LaRue Freestone. Divorce action. The court grants the plaintiff a decree of divorce to become final three months ofter signing and entry and approves the stipulation on the property settlement. settle-ment. Dale Stewart vs. Ila Rae Stewart. This case came on for trial. The court finds the plaintiff entitled to a decree of divorce to become final three months after signing and entry and awards custody of the minor child to the plaintiff plain-tiff with visitation rights granted the defendant. The court finds that proof of mailing of the findings of fact and conclusions con-clusions of law and decree of divorce are to be filed with the court. Cynthia H. Workman vs. Gary L. Workman. This case came on for trial. The court finds the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of divorce from the defendant defen-dant and awards the custody of the minor child to the plaintiff with visita tion rights granted the defendant at reasonable times and places. Decree to become final three months after signing sign-ing and entry. The court approves the stipulation and property settlement filed fil-ed in the case. Wilma A. Cobb, as guardian ad litem Andrew Boggess, a minor vs. Northwestern Nor-thwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Com-pany and Walter P. Boggess. This matter mat-ter came before the court for trial. The plaintiff was presented by his counsel. The defendant, Northwestern Mutual Life Inusrance Company was dismissed with prejudice as defendant. Walter P. Boggess was sworn and testified. The court finds that Walter P. Boggess disclaims any and all interest in the insurance in-surance monies. The monies are to be deposited in American Savings and Loan. Ronald G. Alston vs. Lane Fletcher. This matter came before the court for a pre-trial. A stipulation was made into - the record to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. The defendant's counsel is to prepare the order. State of Utah vs. Carla Evan Cole. This matter came before the court for a hearing. The State moves to amend the information. The defense concurrs. The defendant entered a plea of guilty to the amended information. The plea is accepted ac-cepted by the court. The defendant waives the statutory time and requests a pre-sentence investigation be made by the Adult Probation and Parole Dept. The sentence will be pronounced February 26, 1980 at 9 a.m. The bond may continue. State of Utah vs. Johnnie L. Boren. This matter came before the court for a hearing. The State makes the motion to amend the information on both counts I & II. The State addressed the court. The defendant concurrs. The court questions ques-tions Sherrie Boren as to the motion. The court accepts the plea and the plea is now entered. The defendant waives the time and requests a pre-sentence investigation in-vestigation from the Adult Probation and Parole Dept. Upon request of counsel, the sentence is to be pronounced pronounc-ed in Provo at the Utah County Building at 1:30 p.m. on February 22, 1980. |