OCR Text |
Show - - , 1. , I In the Fourth Judicial District Court d Die State of Utah in and for Uintah County before Judge David Sam November 27, 1979. State of Utah vs. Naomi Ann Hen-drickson. Hen-drickson. This matter came before the court for passing of sentence on the defendant. The Court sentenced the (jefendant to be confined and imprisoned im-prisoned in the Utah State Prison for a period of five years. The execution of Lbe sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed on probation for a period of eighteen months with all the conditions of the probation. State of Utah vs. Brian Beavers. The Court grants the request by the State (nat this matter be continued to December 11, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. State of Utah vs. Brian Beavers. The bond in this matter is reduced to $2,000 cash bond as requested by the counsel for the defendant. State of Utah vs. Brian Beavers. Upon request of the Adult Probation and Parole Department, this matter is continued to December 11, 1979 at 9:30 a.ra. State of Utah vs. Mark Haluska. This case is reset for December 6, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. State of Utah vs. Carta Evon Cole. The trial date is reset for January 22, 1980 at 9:30 a.m. In the matter of the organization of the Uintah Water Conservancy District, pursuant to chapter 9, title 73, Utah Code Annotated, 1953 as amended. This was the time fixed for the appointment ap-pointment of directors for the Uintah Water Conservancy District. Meril Snow and Alvin Kay are nominated. The Court approved the nominations. Janice Colene Day vs. Julius Demp-sey Demp-sey Day. This matter came before the court on an order to Show Cause. Both parties agreed to be bound by the stipulation entered into the record. Trial date is set for February 28, 1980 at 9:30 a.m. Patricia Ann Bigelow vs. Raymond Gene Bigelow. This matter came before the court on an Order to. Show Cause. This matter was continued in the Judge's chambers. Both parties agreed to be bound by the stipulation entered into the record. Uintah County and Vernal City. vs. Elbert Baese and Oaka Baese, Karl J. Baese and Max B. Rasmussen and Joyce G. Rasmussen? r This matter .' . dime befce3Gourt:;orp aJSIoticevOf.; Hearing and a Motion for and Order of . Immediate Occupancy. A check was deposited with the Court in the amount of $4,394 by the plaintiffs. The court grants the Motion for Immediate Occupancy. Oc-cupancy. Debra Jean Van Wagoner vs. Michael Jay Van Wagoner. This matter came before the court .on a divorce action. The court grants the plaintiff a decree of divorce with all the prayers of the complaint to become final 31 days after signing and entry. Lillian Simper vs. Gary Simper. This matter came before the court on a default divorce. A waiver, stipulation and property settlement have been signed and filed in this case. The Court approved the property settlement. The Court grants the plaintiff a decree of divorce to become final 3 months after signing and entry. James L. Sweeden vs. Barbara L. Sweeden. This matter came before the ; Court on a divorce action. A stipulation was made into the record and approved by the court. The court grants the plaintiff a decree of divorce to become final three months after signing and entry. 1 Judy S. Stevens vs. Duane Stevens. This matter came before the court on a divorce action. A stipulation was made i into the record and approved by the ! Court. The Court grants the plaintiff a ! decree of divorce to become final three ; mnths after signing and entry. La Fay Peterson vs. Leland F. Warr, : R.Speirs and Jerry L. Morris. This j the time fixed for trial. The ; Plaintiff and defendants appeared in i Person and were represented by ; wunsel. The law issues will be sub-; sub-; milted by brief and memorandums ith plaintiffs having twenty days and j twenty days allowed for responses. Ivan Duane Ellifritz vs. Marion ' Stella Ellifritz. This was the time wed for trial. A stipulation was made the record and both parties agreed ' be bound by it. The plaintiff with-e with-e his complaint. The defendant was : orn and testified. The Court grants "te defendant a deer"" of divorce to eme final thirty-one days after signing and entry. Gerald E. Jacobsen et. al. vs. Heber Irunnell and Morris Harris, dba ' ganger Construction. This was the i "toe fixed for trial. A stipulation was .ade into the record. A written : sllPulati0n will be filed and approved ; all parties. .Joe.H. Boone and Annie H. Boone vs. Junir Jenkins and Rola Jenkins. This as e time fixed for trial. The pendants counsel made a stipulation ,!the record. The Court approved the stipulation. Walker Bank and Trust Company, a Banking Corporation vs. William ' Johnson, Carla A. Johnson and I dward P. Souders. This matter was '"cken from the calendar. Sheila Rae Vanderdraats vs. David C Vanderkraats. This matter came before the Court on a Request for Trial Setting. Trial date is set for December 11, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. Dennis M. Higley and Raunie H. Higley vs. Clyde Ruppe and Alice B. Ruppe. This matter came before the Court on a request for trial setting. The trial date is set for December 11, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. Juanita Jean Nash vs. Harold Kenneth Nash. This matter came before the court on a Request for Trial Setting. The trial date is set for December 11, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. Gerald Mobley vs. H. James Shewell and Sand M. Electric, Inc. This matter came before the Court on the request for trial setting. Trial date is set for December 11, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. Wendell K. Nash, dba Uintah Collection Service vs. Jennie Cranford. This matter came before the Court on a Motion and Order in Supplemental Proceedings. The court, as requested, called for the defendant. She was not present in court. A bench warrant may be issued with a bond of $50. Wendell K. Nash, dba Uintah Collection Service vs. David H. Arnold. This matter came before the Court on a Motion and Order in Supplemental Proceedings. The Court, as requested, called for the defendant. He was not present in court, A bench warrant may be issued with a bond in the amount of $50. Phillip B. Harrison, et. al. vs. Local Union 1498 of the Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiner of America and Sadie A. McConkie. This matter came before the Court for a pre-trial. A telephone conference was held with Judge David Sam. A trial date was not set at this time. George Millecam and Helen Millecam vs. Lyle McKeachnie and Vanda McKeachnie. This matter came before the Court on a pre-trial. Counsel for both parties addressed the court as to the issues. The court requested a meeting with the litigants at this time. The motion to consolidate case No. 10,224 and 10, 243 is granted. A trial date is set for March 6, 1980 at 9:30 a.m. The discovery is to end January 31, 1980. Basin Loans, Inc.; a Utah Corporation, Cor-poration, vs. Milton C. Hacking, et. al. This matter came before the Court on a ! continuance on a motion and order in " supplemental proceedings. The,1 -Courts n called for the defendants. They were not present in Court. It was requested that the court issue an Order to Show Cause. The Court granted the request. Cathy Richardson vs. Brent G. Richardson. This matter came before the Court on the request for trial setting. set-ting. It was stated to the Court that a pre-trial would be necessary. Pre-trial is set for December 11, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. to follow law and motion. Patricia Maxine Lopez vs. Steven Lopez. This matter was continued to . this date for hearing. A stipulation was filed and an agreement was reached. Jay R. Pope vs. Alta Pope. This matter came before the Court on the Motion for Order to Show Cause in Re: Contempt. Upon request of counsel, this matter is continued to December 11, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. Linda A. Barney vs. Douglas L. Barney. This matter came before the Court on an Order to Show Cause. The plaintiff appeared in person and was represented by counsel. The defendant was sworn and testified. In the Fourth Judicial District Court of the State of Utah in and for Uintah County before Judge J. Robert Bullock, November 29 and 30. Sharon Collier vs. Rick L. Frerichs. This case came on for trial by jury. Both the plaintiff and the defendant appeared in person and were represented by counsel. The case was argued to the Court and jury by . respective counsel and submitted. The jury retired at 11 a.m. and returned at 11:45 a.m. with the following verdict, To Wit: We, the jury in the above entitled en-titled case answer the question propounded to us as follows: 1. At the time and place of the accident and immediately prior thereto was Rick L. Frerichs negligent in such manner as to be a cause of the accident? No. The jury finds "no cause of action." The jury was discharged and excused from further consideration of this case. In the Matter of the Estate of Elba Justice. This was the time fixed for trial. A settlement has been reached in this matter. |