OCR Text |
Show EX-WIFE ASKS BALM; CLAMS v v' I DIVORCED MATE WOOED AGAIN I J, I N. E. A. Staff Correspondent. OMAHA, Nob., May 29. A true story, stranger than fiction, which had its beginning eight years ago to the tune of a wedding march, waning into the divorce court and then drifting back to an echo of the first love affair, af-fair, has just entered the breach of promise suit chapter. Marie Brool'-s and Goorgc Hazen were mairrod. back in 1912. For six 1 years they lived happily and threo j little Hazens arrived. Wife Granted Divorce. In 191S Mrs Hazcn was granted a divorce. Alimony of $S5 a month was not enough for the three little kiddies and herself, so she went to work. In March, 1920, she says in her petition, peti-tion, her ex-husband came back to her and wooed her again. She took his pleadings 'under advisement," sno aays, and ho- purchased a homo Into which his former wife and their chll- B h W dren moved. i'1 ff Then "tho samo girl who broke up B ' W our first home," according to Mrs. W Hazcn, stepped in again. Hazen then ' "B ; 1 told his former wife ho had no inten- B f n tion or remarrying her, she says. W j 5. "Fighting for ItitldJCs" W ; f Now Mrs. Haaon has asked that her ',' j former husband be ordered to pay her S I $25,000 for breach of promise. "I am j making tho fight for the kiddles' sake St ' I she says. '"They need their father." I Hazen denies the allegations and M I I puts tho blame for their trouble on re- m L I latives, Mrs Mario Hazen, George Haz- m L II , en and their three children. jl |