| OCR Text |
Show SUGAR SUIT LOSERS 1 WOULD RIOPEN CASE J. A. Hendrickson and L.j N. Stohl Ask $184,430 j and 137 Shares. Compensation Is Sough, ; for Services as Agents of Company. A p-vution w:ri Med by the defendants .-t i -I'd; j y in fir! Third d i.-:t r!et court to tin; :-.uil of the "W. :st Caclu; Sugar wnipanv aiimsf .. A. Mend hckf.on and Lorenzo N. Stuhi, r:n aetiun to recover .i-rr"t. promotion pro! it t. In which Judge W li. I:,:!))!--! found for the plaintiff fn -nruji." of :;. I S'-o. '1'bu p' M I i r i ! i rrpri ; -?nt t!l3 ".. a! llcfc '! rouri':' imminent I.-; that they were aft-nl.-' nf tii- ."UK.ir company In its promotion pro-motion ih-y ;w..: cntiiicd to compensation 1 fur I huh' .--TV (::. '1 hi- p. -tit Inn w.i'A accompanied by an affidavit af-fidavit inaih- hy Mr, Hendrickson Netting fur Hi (-ia hii" tni aling ? lS-!.4.'(0 in money a ii'l I :i i" :- li.-' r of l he ea p'ta' stock of ' h- W i ii'-hc Siifjar '"on ipany. , rju -iii-iii:! mi tli.- -i-ti!if'n aie to be heard by .( M J - hrame! Tl.ur.-du v afternoon at - o cUh-K. Soils li.'uik Interests. Won! of tlir Hoi'iiitf out by Mr. llen-'Irirlu llen-'Irirlu -iM of In.- i in r rr:;i ,s in the Farmers .V. S T-hfi ni S.i irm,' bank at. Logan and in tin- H 'i'IImx ill- Stat- bunk nab received irom 1.0.7:111 'f' 1 01 'lav , The dual way ae-t ae-t mm 1 1 - pu ( 1 1 1 roil l; h last Sa t urda . Mr. 1 1 fintrii-k mi ..'iiiii' at the time from the iroiid"iii-v and ii i it? 1 -tur;i t c of the Lol'hii hank Tim .leal involvi' an amount iiih-tbini iii Ki't'ii-j of f.ll.'iiin. The pur--h-r.-iM w.-r Wdli-nn and L. AT. HoMl. Hit ri ion r li .o.m.v pi-pf-iilent for the Logan 1 hank I.- :-.-hod.i!.Hl to la ke place at a nnuTiiiK of tin- board of directors Thurfi- i day n ik ht.' A tt -on 1 tranxtcr of F'righam City propi rty h d-.-il froni oreno N. Stohl and 'innic Siobl to the trustec-in-trust "f c Mtj rn ion I'liurcli i: reported from t ' r uli.uii it v. 'I' he deed vas recorded in f h- off ii-M of the cnu nt v recorder of i Huvc:di i count v on March -.'. 1910. bv i 1 )h vld Smhl. Sruther of Lorenzo N. Stohl. ciTtifk-d copy fiirn::licd by the county ! ,-nnii r ' the record in his office shows I t h" di-fd In have been ex ecu led on Oc-i Oc-i lobf-r '-M. l!'lt. in I lie presence of and I rertifird in hy Leo L. Penrose on October I ..':. I'M I . Mr. l'r'mne l.s an employee in the office of die Peiieficl:l Life Insurance i cemp.'iny :nd a notary public. The prop-I prop-I ei-r . is cm i mated to be worth about ! I '.Vint. i .MTidavil Only Filed. Mnly iliF- affidavit of Mr. Hendrickson . win- filed est erday in support of tho . pet i i Wiii for reopening of the case, and hcrj rii ig on el:i hii. for services rendered .is ;j kcii t Mr. Stohl is repurted to be 1 nut of the stair. , .Vr. Hendrickson ;:.-ts forth as the prin- . c'kjI claim of tho defendants that they ; did ,; I iiV;ho wu.-th of work in negotiating the pu relet ve of the Knigh t ugar com-panv's com-panv's plant :nd moving it to Com Is h, I'i-eiiM allf . lb attests further that he was lnytruin.MV.nl in selline: OOn.nOD shares ot ilic capital stock of the West Cache Sug;ir company, recciing only sri'.liofl in c mi in 'ss'ons, whereas he claims that be va1' entitled o I.", per ent. or $75,000. IT o a ski; .H,l.Mt,0 lor having obtained the 'cet conl no-is incident to organization of the company. .iju.Onn for getting tho . il-' donMtei hy landowners of Cornish, . 1 " 1 paid for services to J. K. Feather-' :tmu :S'jr expended in getting beet con i raeis and S 1 25 pa id to A t torney James : H, Hammond for drawing the articles of j i neorpnra t ion of i he company. Stork Claims Made. Further claim 's made for stock 'as follows : Si t f ha res 'given as a bonus j to Ihe K li'cht 1 n vest men t company, and j hon uses for t wel ve shares to Abraham .top-en sen.' t on shares to United States Solictor AVilUam H. King, ten to the late ''red J. K'iesel, ten to John A. Anderson, ten to Kohert A. Moves, five to Joseph F. Feathersto io muI tw enty to. L. D. Neb-hill, Neb-hill, son - in law of Mr. Hendrickson. Tho affiant attests that he believes that I here a ru ot tier just cla in is which de- feiidants might make against the company com-pany for service: rendered and asks per-' per-' m "ss ion of the court to submit supple- menial Information with regard to them. The judgment won by tlie company in it suit was allowed on a complaint cha ruing the defendants with secret ab-st ab-st faction of promotion profits in connection connec-tion with the operations whereby the p'ant of ihe Knight Sugar company w as acquired and mo cd from Canada to '"nosh. Throughout t rial of the case the defendants de-fendants contended that they nevfr were at any time agenlsof the plaintiff corporal cor-poral ion, with regard to the making of the deal for purchase and removal of the K n is; lit factory. Now they base their claim for remuneration on the ruling of i i i court establishing their status as .-.gents. |
