| Show t WORK OF THE COURTS te I The Contractors of the Jackson i School House Dispute FOR BUILDING MATERIALS gAIiT LAKE BUttDIKG AND 5IAJTU FACTCIUjG COSVES E GUARDS a T Iinwreiicc on Trfa1 for EnI IzHnfi 649 SUcei Divnuge Suits Against the Union Piutlilc Railway Company Asrspceiitlnc 0023 Short Orders and Judeiucnw Entered En-tered Clilef Justice Jlerritt Makes a Setting or Civil Jury Cases for Trial from 3IareH 13 to April 3 i The appeal case of August Hensgen vs George Morrow came up before Chief Justice Merritt The suit was r E originally brought before Justice Hall 7 who gave judgment for the plaintiff for 200 and costs from which the de iendant appealed The plaintiff stated j that on October 21 1592 > he and the defendant entered Into a contract by the terms of whIch the latter was to do the carpenter work on the Jackson it Is that school building and alleged I the i defendant failed to carry out his l agragnent wherefore the plaintiff clalm damages In the sum of 5239 Defendant alleged that he performed his part of the contract as far as possible pos-sible but that the plaintiff failed to perform the conditions imposed upon him in that he failed to make the vuekly payments as provided In the contract and defendant asked 21lt > 9 damages Attorney Street appeared for the plaintiff and S H Lewis and C Ira Krebs for the defendant The Jury brought in a verdict for the plaintiff for 10240 IToi fluildingIateiaI J T24 trial of the suit of the Salt Lake Building ana Manufacturing company vs E Richards was begun before the chief justice and a jury Attorney J H Moyte appeared for the plaintiff and Messrs Sawyer and Putnam for the defendant The suit was brought to recover 25S34 with Interest In-terest from July 29 1890 for building material sold and delivered The defendant alleged that the ma ierial was charged for at an excessive price and that at the regular market value the amount would have been about 150 less than the sum claimed The hearing was in progress when court adjourned till 10 oclock this morning |