OCR Text |
Show CASES FOR TRIAL I DISTRICT COURT IN SEPTEMBER Some very important cases are set for the September term of the District Dis-trict court. Only occasional sessions havo been held during the warm weather, but with the arrival of fall begins the regular dispensing of justice. jus-tice. Following are the cases which will be heard during the month of September before Judge J. A. Howell: How-ell: State of Utah vs. W. Tracy, misdemeanor; misde-meanor; Sept. 11. Elva Woodcock vs. Lloyd S. Woodcock, Wood-cock, divorce; Sept. 11. City of Ogden vs. A. Schuman, selling sell-ing goods without license; Sept. 12. Ogden Examiner Publishing company com-pany vs. C. W. Blair et al, law; Sept. 13. The Denver Metal company vs. Lincoln Lin-coln Kemmerer Coal company, law; sepi. 16. Walter Blake vs. Daisy Blake, divorce; di-vorce; Sept. 13. Jos. G. Crompton ys. Geo. Halver-son, Halver-son, law; Sept. 14. Lois Wiggins vs. Clifford R. Wiggins, Wig-gins, divorce; Sept. 14. John C. Davis vs. Robert A. Moyes, law; Sept. 15. City of Ogden vs. Earnet Lawrence, gambling; Sept. 18. Ida Harker vs. George A. Harker, divorce; Sept. 18. Leland Briem, by guardian ad litem vs. Brown Ice Cream company, law; Sept. 19. Continental Rubber company vs. Proudfit Sporting Goods company, law; Sept. 20. Solomon C. Stephens vs. Luella Dox-ey, Dox-ey, law; Sept. 21. H. W. Dunn vs. Southern Pacific company, law; Sept. 22. Nancy E. Graham vs. Corey Bros. Construction company, law; Sept. 23. Sidney Stevens Implement company vs. John Paul, appeal; Sept. 25. Loul Nordin vs. Albert S. Ferrln, equity; Sept. 2G. Antoni Van Bentham vs. Frank Ver-hall Ver-hall et al, law; SepL 28. O. E. Runyan vs. Security State Bank, appeal; Sept. 29. oo |