OCR Text |
Show II' ! July 8, 65 Big "Runoff," C.R.S.P. power offered (as I daddv inumitTB available) to NON-PREFERENCE ADMINISTRATION, Feb. 19 53 20 YEAR FRANCHISE GIVEN S.U.P. customers to 5 yrs., SUBJECT TO P. on J 1940 to 1050 Feb. 26, 53 Given 13 mo. before old franchise ex- CUSTOMER DEMAND. Juiy o, 65 I July 31, 47 Power rationed, farmers in trouble. j pired. Oct. 15, 65 Cedar Power Bd. Chrm. says city Is satis- cal P c I Oct. 18, 47 ' V. Pres. of Southern Utah Power March 5, 53 So. Utah Power acknowledges receipt of tying requirements to become a pre- ' a' I WHETTEN, announces stock sale to im- two copies of 20 year franchise. ference customer. What now? . Temporarily given I prove & expand company. I March 5, 53 CITIZEN S COMMITTEE PROTEST: No Oct. 26, 65 B.O.R. now willing to enter 20 yr. GOVERNMENT power I Dec. 11,47 Agriculture & Industry suffering, citizen's ' public hearing, no council discussion. contracts with ANY PREFERENCE subject to I groups formed. ' I Mayor & 3 of 5 Councilmen cannot bind CUSTOMERS until all C.R.S.P. power preference I Jan 15, 48 Southwestern Utah Power & Develop- ' city for 20 yrs. ' is under contract. DELIVERY TO BE customer I ment organized. PARRY Pres. ' March 7, 53 Petition filed with City Recorder for refer- NOT LATER THAN APRIL 70. demand. I March 18, 48 U.S. Steel to supply their own power ' endum on 20 year franchise. I needs. I March 26, 53 Petition filed: 449 signatures, 430 certified WHETTEN ADMINISTRATION, J Sept. 2, 48 Objectives of Southwestern Utah Power & ' by County Clerk, only 390 signatures 1960 to 1074 Development. I necessary. CITY WON'T ACCEPT. Jan. 13, 66 Whetten appoints K. Jones Sept. 16, 48 LQQ, PRES. OF SO. UTAH POWER CO. I April 9, 53 Petitioners file petition with State Sept. 22, 66 (Q) CITIZENS GROUPS ask C. Council to head Cedar Power Board, j -"TS.U.P.), appointed ASSOCIATE I Supreme Court. for "status" of C.R.S.P. power allotment. I I TRUSTEE by Trustee SMYTH, of Wash- I April 16, 53 SUPREME COURT SERVES WRIT ON Sept. 27 66 CITY MGR. requests "city's" status on I I ington Gas & Electric Co. (W.G.E.) CEDAR CITY OFFICIALS. preference list. I I BANKRUPT and mother co. of S.U.P. I Oct. 1, 53 Attorney outlines dangers & irresponsi- Oct. 4, 66 (A) No contract deadline, but contracts I J April 7, 49 Southwestern Utah Power Federation I bility in granting 20 yr. fran. It's what going fast. MUST HAVE A MUNICIPAL I organized to purchase Southern Utah I franchise does rof contain that makes it SYSTEM. I I Power Co.'s system. Plan approved. I vicious. Oct. 13, 66 (A) No contract deadline, city to be noti- I I April 21, 49 Mayor Parry to take steps if S.U.P. refuses j FRANCHISE NOT FOR 20 YEARS SAY LEADERS- -. fied of such deadline. I to sell since S.U.P. has no franchise. I Oct. 22, 53 Mayor Broadbent: Franchise can be ANY May 1, 67 Hanson (V.P. of Cal. Pac.) & K. Jones I I Electric service a failure. J LENGTH up to 20 yrs. (Councilman) send questions to B.O.R. I J April 28, 49 Southwestern Utah Power Federation will ' City Attorney Fenton: Franchise is V- prior to May 3, meeting in S.L. to talk to I I buy total system EXCEPT Cedar. Cedar to ' DETERMINATE length up to 20 yrs. B.O.R. about Power & Municipal System. I I buy that portion. J Oct. 1, 53 Attorney General Callister: City can take "! May 15, 67 At least 3 times Hanson & Jones told they 1 I j June 30, 49 Application for $6,500,000 in R.E.A. funds over ANY TIME. CANNOT ACCEPT, SELL, OR CON- I j -looks ok. that 1 TRACT C.R.S.P. POWER TO OR THRU A I July 21, 49 Electric system appraised, bid submitted. WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT j PRIVATE UTILITY. I I SMYTH says no suitable bid received. LENGTH OF FRANCHISE IS SUBJECT rmjune 8, 67 C. Council says NO when asked to let the I I August 4, 49 Revised plan for purchase to be submitted TO VOTE OF THE PEOPLE, VOTERS I people vote on a Municipal System. I ( by SMYTH APPROVE ACTION OF GRANTING J 1 WHETTEN: aTY STILL HAS 6 YRS. I I August 25, 49Trustees of S.U.P. ACCEPT $550,000 for 20 YEAR FRANCHISE - I LEFT ON CAL. PAC.'S FRANCHISE. I j C. stock from Federation. 2,555 VOTES CAST: 1,410 FOR, J 2) Plenty of C.R.S.P. power available. I ' I Sept. 1,49 L.A. Banker submits bid. SMYTH sends ' 1,145 TO NULLIFY i June 1, 67 Council "minutes" say NOTHING about I j telegram (830) to S.U.P., NO BID RE- I ! 1) and 2) is vague. I w. . . CEIVED FROM POWER FEDERATION. I ANDERSON ADMINISTRATION, March 11, 68 (Q) Cedar Power Board member asks Jan. 11 68 wnettm i appoints K. Jones Oct. 6, 49 MALE Attorney for W.G.&E. sends tele- j 1054 to 1962 J about receiving C.R.S.P. power thru Cal. I Pwer Boara- grfcudgeCoxe ordered distribution of , Jan. 9, 58 Cal Pac. - S.U.P. announce merger plans. ' . Rfl C I J Soc,NewBd.ofD,tobeap- June 19, 58 Cal Pac. - S.U.P merger complete. 68 ( aTY CAN Oct. 13, 49 NEW S.UPsBOARD OF DIRFCTORS ! Oct. 24, 60 (Q) Anderson inquires to Interior Sec- I CONTRACT NOW, BUT TO PURCHASE, I I -LOEB (Pres.), L7 JONEsVl&Lt HAHN I GINBERG retary about Colorado River Storage J MUST HAVE A MUNICIPAL SYSTEM. I I GLIDDEN- BULLOCH. ' ' Project Power (C.R.S.P ). J July 3, 69 AUGUST 11, 69 DEADLINE GIVEN TO I OFFICERS I Nov. 4, 60 (A) Bureau of Reclamation (B.O.R.) in I CONTRACT FOR C.R.S.P. POWER. I j I -LjOEB, (Pres.), SMALLEY (V. '.), THOMAS (V.P. & Mgr.), I market study. After study applications I Aug. 22, 69 City misses deadline. Not ready to I I i COX ISec. & Treas.), ADAM S (Ass't. Sec & Tres ) solicited. contract-wants one year extension. NO I ; Oct. 2b, 49 Parry receives CONFIRMATION from Sept. 28, 61 (Q) Anderson inquires to Regional Dir- , PLANS TO P UT ON BALLOT IN FALL. I LOEB & SMY' "H of ACCEPTANCE of j ector (B.O.R.) about C.R.S.P. power. V .Aug. 25, 69 Attorney for city, CAN'T CONTRACT I I Southwestern Utah Power Federation bid. Oct. 6. 61 (A) Study being conducted, when com- r FOR POWER. CAL. PAC. AND CITY I Oct.27,V9 Procedure out ined by SMYTH to acquire plete, applications to prospective HAVE FRANCHISE. DOESN'T EXPIRE I S.U.P.(3stePi). I customers. t UNTIL 1973. I L-J I ' Aug. 28, 69 Regional Dir. to review City's request for I I Nov.3,4te Letter jgto .probably GARDNER ADMINISTRATION, 1 yr. extension. n,9othru BROADBENTsayshl9her , 1962 to 1966 I Aug. 28, 69 (After 6 years) Regional Dir. to B.O.R. in i id made. ., J Washington recommends Cedar be al- I I Nov. 10,49 BROADBENT DEFEATS PARRY FOR . Jan. 1. 63 CEDAR OFFERED C.R.S.P. POWER lowedtocontractforC.R.S.P.poweronor MAYOR (1241 to 963) I ALLOTMENT. I before JAN 26, 70. If not complied with, I Election set for Dec. to go Municipal j May 1, 63 Regional Director (B.O.R.) to Gardner, j terminate. I (Cedars portion of S.U.P.). I per 11863 letter: 1) City has one year to , Jan. 9, 70 Regional Dir. to Mayor: IN LIEU OF I Dec. 1,49 Parrv: IF CITY VOTES MUNICIPAL, ( sign contract 2) ARRANGE FOR MUNI- J EXTENSION MUST EXECUTE 1 I 0WER COMPANY WILL NOT DARE i CIPAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WITHIN CONTRACT ON OR BEFORE JAN 26, I GRANT A LONG TERM FRANCHISE. 4 REASONABLE TIME THEREAFTER. 70; HAVE MUNICIPAL DISTRIBUTION 1 I Dec. 15, 49 FnE.A. APPROVES $9,000,000 in loans for I Nov. 1, 63 (Q) Cedar Power Board member Smith I SYSTEM BY APRIL 1, 72. - I Southwestern Utah Power Federation I inquires to Senator Moss about C.R.S.P. . Jan. 14, 70 Attorney for City (Boyden) reviews con- I J project. Municipal election set for Dec. 30, I power. WANTS. TO KNOW ABOUT J ' tract with B.O.R.: ASSURES MAYOR, I I ; 1940. CEDAR-CAL. PAC. 20 YEAR , NO LIABILITY TO CITY IF SIGNED & I Dec. 22, 49 GLIDDEN arrives in Cedar, says 1 FRANCHISE. NO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM BY 4172. IN J W.GE. bondholders will not sell, BUT J Nov. 14, 63 (A) Acting commissioner to Moss: Cedar , J GENERAL NO LIABILITY TO CITY I I WAITING TO SEE OUTCOME OF J has one year to contract for power; must WHEN SIGNED UNLESS SERVICE IS 1 I ELECTION. I obtain municipal distribution system in t INITIATED. I 1 . I reasonable time thereafter. CAL. PAC. i Jan. 14, 70 Whetten tells Boyden who informs B.O.R. I I DEC. 30, 49 CEDAR VOTES TO, GO MUNICIPAL- OBLIGATED TO TERMINATE PRESENT Cal Pac s franchise doesn't expire until I I (896to795) CONTRACT WITH CITY, WHEN CITY 1973 (20 years). If by April 1, 72 Cedar is I I DESIRES. -f going to utilize this C.R.S.P. contract, I I BROADBENT ADMINISTRATION, March 16, 64 (Q) Cedar Power Board Chrm. Corry J B.O.R. SAYS WE CAN AGAIN APPLY I J 195oTo1954 inquires to Regional Dir. about C.R.S.P. t FOR AN EXTENSION TO CONFORM TO I IT - power. CAL PAC.'S FRANCHISE EXPIRATION I Jan. 12. 50 14 engineering firms meet in Cedar prior March 19, 64 (A) Regional Dir. responds to Chrm. I DATE (1973). I I to selecting chtef engineer for $9,000,000 (copy to SMITH). CITY HAS UNTIL JULY MAYOR WHETTEN SIGNS CONTRACT I :rpFTTEa,'0Tam J''ne5'64 Cily Attorney Burns, requests forms 10 SSSS & WHETTEN. apply for power. r-MMrtT 0rcrRc pnuFR I I March 23, 50 SMYTH receives biVfrom California June 25, 64 Regional Supvr. responds that July 1, 64 nSulfruDATE" If oower avaNable I I Pacific Utilities ConW deadline extended indefinitely in which to J oZSUZm lAug.3,50 BOND HOLDERS WON'T SELL. Judge contract for power. City to be notified SZtS I I Coxe orders S.U.P. C.Wk redistributed. when time limit imposed. I "contract NOW Jan 22 70 Whetten appoints K. Jones Aug. 10, 50 TTOEB, BULLOCH and L JONES local Oct. 2, 64 B.O.R. offers Cedar another 75MW. Offer Feb 3 70 Commissioner to Regional Dir.: Stop to head Cedar Power Board. S.U.P. board members. to Preference Customers. i ' ' Qiot;nc with nntpntial rustomers 1 I Oct. 12, 50 EscalanteV. Pumpers suVer. call for an Oct. 26, 64 Mayor admits Cedar not a preference WHO DO NOT I I investigation of service. customer. Asks to be kept on list and l nisTRiRimON SYSTEM I I SOUTHWESTERN UTAH POWER BECOMING a preference customer. t holding power for POTENTIAL I FEDERATION, APPROVED, VOTED customers who are unable to utilize 1 ON, AND FUNDED WITH C.R.S.P. power WITH A MUNICIPAL I $0,000,000 BECOMES HISTORY I SYSTEM. I I I Feb. 20, 70 Attorney for city blames B.O.R.: City can't I j I acquire system if no power source I j CEDAR'S ELECTRIC HERITAGE (47-77) April 10, 70 BO .R .to City Attorney, YOU HAD 7 I I wi-uhh j utuv nicMCTIwr SaBw J YEARS SINCE YOUR INITIAL I I COMPLETE... DOCUMENTED... DISGUSTING... 25 1 ALLOTMENT AND YOU DIDN'T VOTE I I NOV. 8, 1977 jr . FOR A MUNICIPAL DISTRIBUTION I I CAL. PAC. OR CEDAR CITY JT 1 SYSTEM. I I 1 Kerry Jones PresenFMAYOR, Stockholder in Cal Pac. M ATK J May 26, 70 Ellis Armstrong. Commissioner B O R.: I I I Former: (3 time) Head of Cedar Power A ! 1' LAWhetton Former: Mayor, Southwestern Utah Power f tW 1 ! ro!S A SSRA Federation Board member. V. JSalJJh Fwr . jSr i ll L. V. Broadbent Former: Mayor. Southwestern Utah Power fl tTV B J held for a POTENTIAL customer. Federation Board mbej. tl i July 26, 73 MAYOR WHETTEN SIGNS ANOTHER W.H.Bulloch Present. Cal. PaoC; .arpdomoe' So uth rfllQj J) 0 30 YEAR FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. U Former. Pres. So. Utah Power Co., So. Utah H V (YXyf M I SINCE NO B.O.R. POWER, CITY ONLY SPRING I 1975 Power Board member ff HAS CAL. PAC. NO PUBLIC HEARING U 11 E.A.Hanson Former: V.P. and D.vision Mgr. Cal. Pac. fofLfL ON THIS ACTION. B.O.R. terminates Cal. Pac. J P Paris Present: V.P. and Division Mgr. Cal. Pac. HTJ HVvCyf ) M f i 'm inn Former So. Utah Power Board member ( Sik V JW VOTERS NOT GIVEN A CHANCE L. m. jones ftr TO VOTE ON A MUNICIPAL GENTLEMEN, WHERE IS YOUR. LOYALTY? yzZj SYSTEM TO OBTAIN THEIR WHAT HAPPENED WHEN YOU WERE OUR LEADERS? C.R.S.P POWER - LOST FOREVER Dec 49 Cedar city voted for municipal power, the May 5, 77 (Q) Myers to both upper and lower K. JOy"i""A.TIO,' Uec" 49 J?" was Lnored Why? Colorado Regions B.O.R. "Can we 1074 to PR11IMT . cn tfi 000 electricTroiect approved. contract for C.R.S.P. power"? May 12. 77 K. Jones appoints Utility Board, ADMITt Aug. 50 fndwd lost Why? May 19, 77 (A)"No more B.O.R. power available." HE IS A STOCKHOLDER IN CAL PAC. Cal Pac securedcheap GOVERNMENT May 26, 77 Jones say. no "firm" power source i July 65 Cal. rac. secureu available for a municipal system. I PrZZcl lotfchancS-vote .or cheap CEDAR CITY CITIZENS, WE'LL TELL YOU WHY . . . June 30. 77 Jones ..y, C. Counci. happy with CI. j Jan. 70 cedar City loses cnance to voieiortnedM Pac. He and C. council have no interest in j Glen Canyon Power Why ..ven wjth rate jncrease after rate increase from Cal. Pac. your MAYOR AND municipal system - too complicated. f j Oct. 77 cedar City is yoked with Cal. Pac. and tne CAL. PAC. STOCKHOLDER KERRY JONES Is satisfied with the Cal. Pac. electric April 14. 77 Utility Board recommends joining j j gheS!h!!ec;t;;f rarSmaSr taskmasters; WE'RE NOT! WE DON'T THINK YOU ARE EITHER and WE'RE I.C.P.A.NoactionbyJonesorC.Council. I I city in the state - and rising rapidly. wI SOMETHING ABOUT IT, BUT WE NEED YOU. April 28, 77 Utility Board to recommend .gain join - I.C.P.A. municipalities. J nAV CATURDAY NOVEMBER 5th WE ENCOURAGE AND EXPECT EVERYONE TO STUDY THE ABOVE May 5, 77 Utility Board recommends joining i . DAY SATUHUAT NUKMwn om OUTLINE AND HAVE A COPY WITH THEM, THEN ATTEND THE PUBLIC MEETING. C pa No action by Jones or C. Council. f LOCATION SUSC AUDITORIUM WE pRQMISE A MOST INFORMATIVE, INTERESTING, AND WORTHWHILE July 7. 77 Utility Board to again ask city to join j TIME 7:30 P.M. PRESENTATION. Car, L Palmer. Vice President ' P A I j I Southern Utah Citizens For Fair Power I I RON COUNTY RECORD -CEDAR CITY. UTAH T 1 A 1 . j Thursday. November 3, 1977 " aiQ AdVertlSemeilt- - ! I |