| OCR Text |
Show ft A The Salt Lake Tribune, Sunday, June 29. 1980 County Residents Hold Key Majority Opposed to Unification By J. Roy Bardsley Salt Lake County, as a whole, is opposed to unification of city and county governments and services. However, City and county residents hold divergent views on the unification issue. Residents within city limits favor unification by a slender margin, while county voters are heavily opposed to consolidation. Here is a comparison of area views, as revealed by an exclusive survey sponsored by The Salt Lake Tribune and conducted by Bardsley & Haslacher, Inc., an independent and impartial re- - WANTED: Current results on unification parallel the pattern produced by the 1978 election when a 0 consolidation measure was defeated by a percent count. Party Attitudes city-coun- ty 60-4- people power Looking at political party attitudes, Democrats tend to favor unification while both Independents and Republicans, particularly the latter, oppose the move by a decisive margin. it's something nordstrom feels very strongly There was also a clear cut cleavage between attitudes of young and older residents. Interviews These results on unification are based on 287 personal interviews with residents of Salt Lake County, distributed proportionately between city and suburban areas. ' . for behtnd-fbe-scene- s peop& to receive, mark' and ship merchandise. T, people to maintain our new building, people to keep it stocked, people with an eye for detail' . ' i a will to succeed. i were f WASHINGTON -- McClure. Against were Laxalt, Wallop and Heres how the senators and House members Simpson. from the Intermountain Area were recorded last week on key roll call votes: SENATE The Senate voted down, 58 to Ronald 38, Reagans proposed $35.8 billion in tax cuts for next year. Recorded : gainst the Republican tax cut 'was Idaho Democrat Frank Chruch. For the tax cut proposal were Republicans Jake Gam and Orrin Hatch of Utah, Simpson and Malcolm Wallop of Wyoming. James McClure of Idaho and Paul Laxalt of Nevada. Not voting was Nevada Democrat Howard W. Cannon. With tax cut proposal dropped, the Senate approved, 54 to 39, the portion of the bill increasing and extending the public debt limit through Feb. 28, 1981. Church was for the extension and against were A1 Gam, Hatch. Laxalt, McClure, Simpson and Wallop. Not voting was Cannon. Approved, 79 to 15, was an authorization bill $25 billion making nearly Cannon, Church, available for transit programs over a period. For passage five-ye- ar Earlier the Senate approved, 84 to 9, the McClure amendment to help increase the efficiency of the urban mass transportation administration by monitoring the agencys paperwork. All of the area senators supported the amendment. All eight were for passage when the Senate a five-yeapproved 92-$36 billion aid to education bill and apa plan to proved, 86-force 80 electric power companies to convert from oil to coal. on a The vote was proposal to charge 9 percent interest on future loans to college students. ar 7, 56-4- For were Cannon, Church, Gam, McClure, Simpson and Wallop. Against were Hatch and Laxalt. HOUSE major bill for the west, authorizing the expenditure of $20 billion for the development of synthetic fuels won final ' congressional approval of the house of representatives by a vote of, 317-9For passage were Utah Democrat Gunn McKay, Utah Republican Dan Marriott and Nevada Democrat Jim San- A tini. Against were Republicans George Hansen and Steven Symms of Idaho and not voting was Richard Cheney of Wyommg. were looking amendment were Cheney 234-16- 20-ye- were Symms, McKay and Marriott. Not voting was Hansen. Turned down, salaries and expense funds of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by $9,680,000. Marriott was for the rejected amend- were Against . :. - McKay, Santini, Cheney and Symms. Not voting was Hansen. The House reversed an vJ. an equal opportunity employer mfh f y. A earlier decision and voted 392-2- 2 to extend to Sept. 30, 1981 the life of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Roden-ticid- e act and also authorize the spending of $72.2 million by the Environmental Protection DU For were McKay, Marriott, Santini and Cheney. Against were Idaho's Hansen and Symms. For passage were AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANYS REPORT TO CONSUMERS Cheney, Hansen, McKay, Marriott, Santini and Symms. Earlier the House rejected, 196 to 216, an amendment to cut $200 million from the water projects bill from funds for the v, . an amendment that sought to increase Agency. experienced salespeople ' and Santini. Against ment. for who find satisfaction In helping others, people who genuinely like people, people with Ideas and potential who want to team' ; grow and expand as we do. ; people power. It's the. difference at nordstrom. help us make it happen at crossroads plaza. APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED 10:005:00 . , ' V.. ' MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY , enter the crossroads plaza store through ' . ,, the north mall entrance and follow signs. ' 169-24- By 240 to 144, the House approved a 5 percent across the board cut of $78 million in the State departments budget for next year. For the cut in state department funds were McKay, Marriott, and Santini. Not voting were Cheney, Ilansen and Symms. 8 By a margin, the House gave final congressional approval to the presidents request for $13.3 million to register 19 and old males for a possible military draft. For were Carney, McKay, Santini and Symms. Against was Marriott and not voting was Hansen. Approved, 334 to 87, a big energy and water development appropriations bill which contained. $92 million for the Central Utah Water Project. , , Heres How They Voted Last Week Garn, Hatch and . ' The maximum sampling tolerance on this size sample is 5.9 percent, plus or minus. Bureau , were looking city-count- y Tribune Washington ' on august 2, we open our exciting new store at crossroads plaza in salt lake city. . .and we are now taking applications in our search for the best possible people to staff if. For example, percent of voters under 45 years of age, many of whom are suburbanites, rejected the consolidation concept, while older people divided fairly well down the middle on the issue. 57 287 ) about. "; WHY Tennessee-Tombigbe- e Waterway project. For the rejected Here are ten good reasons why I am glad I founded an insurance company to protect against the costs of cancer. ohn Diamonds & gold at . Most insurance plans dont cover all the costs of cancer treatment. 1 Most group health insurance can be cancelled or have its premiums adjusted every ear. American Family Lite policies can he cancelled only by the insured. They are renewable tor life .it the then current premium rates yoiuiff of our claimants say they would recommend cancer insurance to their friends. 7. 95 al 2. The average family can easily afford That is a resounding vote of confidence. It means wc our keep promises and pay on time It also means our holders feel that it makes good sense to be better policv protected against cancer expense. our protection. want to help average Americans prevent cancer from becoming a financial burden. Since our policies are supplemental, we can otter our best family cov erage tor approximately 5 10 a month 1 S. The employees insurance. Government agencies, private firms, hospitals, uni- ersities irtually cer type ot American enterprise allows payroll deduction ot our premium These are intelligent, responsible employers who care about the w ot their workers tor vou to remember We are currently paving hern fits to our cancer insurance holders a at rate of A? 5 milpoliq lion a month, and with our growth, these benefits ell-bei- lh increase 4 Most of our claims are paid within one week. agreed that our payments were made promptlv 5. We hav e an outstanding record of service to poIic holders. have over 4 million policies of all tvpes I 8 In )Ust 303 inquiries about American Family L ite were kxlged w ith state insurance departments across the nation, and only 38 ot these w ere about cancer claims That sonlv one inquire tor every 4.284 poltck s m force Teamw ork makes this kind of tecord possible Our sales assv.vi.ttes and home office staff serv ice policies and claims with dedication and thoroughness This attitude of excellence is the backbone ot our company We in force in the 1 1 credit polll to living 'tier U'U .in rviliisivt- i red it card neu polio does not unhide .innu.il tees or ini.ri.ised minimum monthh jimenN Instead our neu credit card s.e.nilu x ou as a pieterred S.lnilxich s customer and entitles ou to a xpiti.il gilt We know that U'ti u ill use our S luihic h sc h.in;e u isc and that ou u ill eno llu' disecu c r that our m u rc dil c ird puts a uine t ot Koutltul and valuable icuclrv at voui lm.;er tips lo.if'ph tor a card pickup, lehuixe.ipplieationatanv fxhuhich sstote IN 9. Our record is built on performance. We ha-4 5 million cancer policies in force worldwide protecting about million people Thusf.irin 180. we haw issued q er 400. 000 cancer insurance policies We are part of a SD00 million company listed on the New Vrk Stock Exchange We perform a public service, and we do it well Business is alwas attracted to those who till a need and perform as they , promise 1 0. We offer peace of mind. A how all else, w e strive to giw peace of mind Those ill with cancer should not ha e to worry that their disease' w ill cause' financial harm to their tamih Oursupplement.il policiescun help remove this concern fcwn policyholders w ho never tile a claim haw the satisfaction ot knowing the hae protection 1 am most proud ot the quick response we make on approv ed claims In BbAwepaid 2" ot our claims u ithm 5 days This n why 87"" ot our sun eed claimants 1 vl ..i- - 1 jj "or more information please write. t f jj ; t - c X ZCMI Center, Fashion Place Mall, Valiev Lair Mall, Cottonwood Mall, Lav ton Hills Mall At ' , v l iL. I' . . , American Family Life Assurance Company "a f . , - i - h ; ' Dc irtmcnt A Co umbus, Georgia )( 'I f 'iy of ox er 58,000 businesses and corporations are protected by our cancer 3. We pay millions of dollars in cancer claims every year. We pav as w e promise. That is a very important fact con-tinua- Amos, Founder ,ind Chairman 6. Our policies are guaranteed renewable for life. Cancer usually requires extensive treatment that can he very expensive. Most group health policies do not pay the full cost ot cancer treatment Supplemental cancer insurance can help pav the difference In addition, cancer insurance can help u ith expenses that can idd suhstantialh to the costs of cancer non-medic- B. J ,) -- f Li 999 American lum My Ufa Amii roncc ) . 31 od r'j |
