OCR Text |
Show was given control of the Castle Gould estate. "Did you go to Europe with Mrs. Gould?" "Yes. I went on the Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse with Mrs. Gould and .Mr. Sells on February 6." I "How soon after yon went to Castle ! Gould did you see Mr and Mrs. Gould j on the r-state?" "Early in June, 1906." I "At what time at Castle Gould did I you find Mrs. Gould under the influence influ-ence of intoxicating liquors?" "I object," said Mr. Shearn, "and I want to argue this point. If tho statements show that she was under the Influence of liquor, It would not give him any justification for abandonment." abandon-ment." Mr. Shearn then cited several authorises auth-orises and a number of precedents, and there was considerable argument. MRIS IIALLOV TESTIFIES FOR DEFENSE TELLS OF MRS. GOULD USING INTOXICANTS IN-TOXICANTS AT CASTLE GOULD. Howard Gould Was Given Permission to Present Evidence That Her Behavior Had Humiliated Him. New York. June 15. Abandonment was the only charge upon which Mrs. Katherine Clemmons Gould'3 suit for separation from her husband, Howard Could rested, when tho hearing of the case was resumed today. The charges of cruelty and non-Fupport, non-Fupport, which were a part of Mrs. Con Id's original complaint, having been stricken out by Justice Dow ling, at the motion of counsel for Mr. Gould, today's evidence was confined to the hearing on abandonment only. Mrs. Gould has declared that she has not spokf? to Mr. Gould since Jul;., lfioc, when she had complained to him about the condition of Maurico Malhn, whom Mr Gould 'had put In charge of Castle Gould, the Long Is- j land home of the Goulds. Subsequently, Subsequent-ly, Mrs. Gould said, her husband tent Elijah Sells to her to say that Mr. Gould would return to her If she would agree to certain conditions, or he would arrange either for a separation sep-aration or divorce. These proposals were rejected by Mrs. Gould. Under the ruling of Justice Dow-ling, Dow-ling, Howard Gould was given permission permis-sion to ' present evidence to support ! charges that Mrs. Gould was addict- , ed to the use of Intoxicants, and that siie hnd humiliated him beforo his , guests. j' Before the resumption of the case . today, a letter from Mrs. Charlotte ; NIcoM Weston, sister of Delancey NIc- , oil, Mr. Gould's attorney, waj given out denying that Mrs. Gould had given giv-en ber a dress. Mrs. Weston said she had never seen Mrs. Gould. When tho letter was 6hown to Mt. Gould, she said. "I did not give the gown to her per- , t-onaMy, but slu- was one of the ae-Ircs-jfoa who' received a box of gowns that I neiit I o one of the theatres." 'Morris Malloy. superintendent of the CaKllr (Jould estate, was the firtt witnens today, called lu the Interest of , Mr. 'Could. Mr. Shearn. for Mrs. Gould, objected to some of the questions ques-tions asked him by Mr. Watson, associate asso-ciate counsel for Mr. Gould, but Jua-.tlce Jua-.tlce Dowllag ruled that it was proper to have ho habits of the plaintiff. Mrb. Gould, proved. Malloy said v |