| Show district court aru the seventh indicts coort court convened conT ened a price ot 01 monday february 8 MT 97 judge jacob jamb johnson presiding pm iding the cab ctet caba a were set for trial at attolini y I 1 notified noti fi and a neuire issued return returnable atole at lot 10 a m wednesday follow ing witte the aam si F AL ewell peterson Pt rw W EL tidwell nathan miller millers jiw mccane cCone il edwsrd edwird edwards ajsa A harrison Harr boo nephi L mclane andrew I 1 mith john drourr erastus frandson Fro Jeon robb J D dunce R Is I 1 remith D 0 mclaughlin J M whitmore J T abuid samuel kiebs wat r 0 P johnson Jobo eon ju jas Roon rooney eyED E D Fulon falmer erand nd win wm murphy la its the casis ot 01 asunta tolotti vs angelo a decree of dirocco was w groo tad the court appointed IL 0 J W wart warf and A a oa omit ten tee of attorneys to 4 P braffit for admittance to the bar the report WM was I 1 favorable and braffit was admitted to practice tIm V birner wm win R ward and T T lamph were admitted to citizen bit prior to adjourn adjournment mert for the day j called at turney to the bar an I 1 ald sald be had been bc informed by letter and through the press that mr mor brownlee had ben been b en permitted to go at large li rge in the day time and alo aw baa boo been permitted penult ted tall lull charge of the jail at night having the la b hi a pow assion i judge bated stated that tt it roch such VM was the fact it bramo his bl duty tu to jav that tb order orders of u the court be en ta for foral v 1 attorney waif th following day n m trew aalt thi jil jal ai A 1 l i I 1 gub and nil r tam cotil after a lo ill lit 10 etim ati it tf tb the joti jail allowed to go to hi hl 1 an ii I 1 to ti welk in th ill IM va I 1 vally vall Y news i auw fah ito H a lri t IKI r r rince with ih ill czora luu jun lot I 1 abc he iti fow day K 1 imi 11 allowed all salt ill I 1 te called hr r S axon olt taft nil lit ry oice int fill lanA tige ige alit to e it very I 1 itin lain to 11 file that an n ader 1 from boa hi itin aniu ni i b I with Ini it wi was a valuable Tk lantI Atle lesson to tile th h tiff to irm tuat must bo b cout mend 11 A by law alit o 0 ling pralle tur tue a giveins mr brownlee had given it aim ki ito very general aut ud crable comment in which the th duag we was out ills action will pat put hm la in a fa po pa loiou brinsc the people NII 11 le dip tit JA al LF 16 duty donant toe i censured to in allowing it aliquo to wem swerve hibit from trout his hi plia plain katr the case of 0 A francis TI vs alice C Q kranci francis wu was and that of alice C francis vs peter A 1 franci francis in the cue case of 11 II dawoud ud rs Ts pleasant vally vall y C coal al 4 ahn 1 tiff do tun emde noted a jury trial which WM was granted 1 the jury being 4 B H 8 smith goor i R robb bb J U M whit mote has 4 petri W J D dunois C P johnson Joh naon has R sall aa 1 F at ewal 11 I 1 he er e soe r ru wait wm on ao nut at al a lack bf bt evid oce judge power powers wad attorney for dmund Noti tind and judge harkness for the lb P V coal com pator the enit suit ot of george A starra TB vs E C lee discharged at t cot cost of plaintiff the emery county cum piny waa was given ja in egem nt la in the sum of 22 87 va T st V leai 1681 ar ur |
