OCR Text |
Show , t Iu,,,,l ., , , toe Fourth Judicial District Court of Sate of Utah in and for Uintah ?eJyWJudge Geor8e E- Ballif- SrchH. 1980. state of Utah vs. Randy James Spain, rtiswas the time fixed for arraign- t Defendant entered a plea of guil-1 guil-1 The court accepts the plea. Other trees are to be dropped. A presence pre-sence investigation is ordered. This tter is continued to March 25. State of Utah vs. Gary Lynn Caldwell, rtis was the time for arraignment of he defendant. The defendant entered a fa of guilty . The court accepted the A pre-sentence investigation is dered This matter is set for sentenc-March sentenc-March 25, 1980. State of Utah vs. Raymond A. iilliams. This was the time fixed for assing of sentence. The sentence is Inended and the defendant is placed in probation for two years. The defen-'-nt agrees to obey all the conditions of i probation. The court retains jnsdiction to make further orders or amend the order of probation as it :eems appropriate. State of Utah vs. Rose Etta Gardiner, fos matter came before the court on lc appeal from the justice court. A filiation made into the record Ssmisses the charges and forfeits the orty dollars as bail expenses. Correct e blue slip report with the driver's jept. The court approves the stipulate stipula-te In the matter of the estate of Jack T. Parkinson. This matter came before he court on the petition for adjudica-jon adjudica-jon of intestacy and formal appoint-nent appoint-nent of personal representative. The jmrt granted the petition to appoint jsa K. Parkinson as personal tpresentative. ' Elaine S. Weisiger vs. John Joseph Green. This matter came before the court on the motion for change of venue. The motion was granted and order filed. i Doris C. Miller vs. James D. Miller. This matter came before the court on in exparte protective order. This is continued for the statutory period. I State Tax Commission of the State of tab vs. Robert E. Covington. This matter came before the court on an order to show cause for failure to obey ixecution order. Continued without dale. t I Mary Anne Reed vs. Michael Allen Eed. Divorce Action; Divorcegranted iiecome final upon entry in the civil lister of action. The plaintiffs maiden inane of 'Gray" is hereby restored to Iter. Denise M. Trujillo vs. Ray Trujillo. this matter came before the court on an order to show cause. A stipulation was made into the record as to the delinquent child support and a judgment judg-ment may enter in the amount of $1,002.90. The defendant is to pay $400 for the month of March 1980 and $300' there after until the judgment is paid in full. Theda M. Allen vs. Douglas Rodney Allen. Divorce action. Plaintiff is granted divorce and awarded the care, custody and control of the minor child subject to reasonable visitation right of the defendant. Defendant is ordered to pay $200 per month child support and assume all responsibility for all debts. Decree to become final in three months. Sherron Schofield Hedrick vs. Donald Robert Hedrick. This matter came before the court on order to show cause. The court approved the agreement reached by the parties. A judgement is to be entered in the amount of $5,700 plus attorney fees of $155 and provides that the defendant pay $200 per month until the judgment is paid in full. Donna Godina vs . Frank Godina .This matter came before the court on exparte ex-parte protective order. Exparte protective protec-tive order is continued for the period allowed by statue. Barbara Diane Hallett vs. Jack Hyrum Hallett. This matter came before the court on an order to show cause. The court orders a temporary support in the amount of $300 a month be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. The restraining order is in force. Wayne Melvin Holmes vs. Barbara Jean Holmes. This matter came before the court on an order to show cause. The court orders the defendant to deliver the properties testified to forthwith. for-thwith. Ashley Valley Water and Sewer Improvement Im-provement District vs. State Engineer of the State of Utah et al. This matter came before the court on the motion to dismiss. The court grants the motion to dismiss on both cases, reserving the right to open either case on March 25, 1980 if deemed necessary. In the Fourth Judicial District Court of the State of Utah in and for Uintah County before Judge J. Robert Bullock, March 18, 1980. R. R. Sather, dba Sather Jewelry vs. John and Leatha Wopsock. This matter came before the court for a trial. The plaintiff's counsel stated that Mr. R. R. Sather is ill and unable to attend and his presence is very important to this case. The defendant's counsel objects to a : continuance of this trial. The deposition of Leatha Wopsock will be taken today with Mr. R. R. Sather paying the expense. ex-pense. A new trial date is set for May 1, 1980 at 8:30 a.m. ' ) ' If'' "j -" ' i - : 5 V X t i 1 1 I 1 v i lJ - f ' ) ANCE CLUB members prepare for the upcoming concert to be Performed at the Uintah High School. |