OCR Text |
Show lEEMDi isy!j Grants Ten InterlurX Eight Final DeerX) Divorce KridajV HOLIDAY LAST WEEM CAUSE or Tflj Mrs. Speight Among S Petitioners; Mrs. 3i Spicy Story W Ten interlocutory decrM Mk and eight final decrees u Mil made by Judge Mo0 0 VV court Frldny In hl roguSH'1 vorco call The caue of uSB busy session wns ino j I-rlday wan a holiday, hcnirW two weeks' cases, ami In bIulK divorces granted there wTR dors to show causo why .ii-B not be paid disposed of Wl Annie Rotchor was -fran'MMR from Steven Butcher on iht Ji desertion and failure to aulMU were married January 15. i2MM Uuleher said that hor huwM in November last. Mnce s!S failed to provido for her f2V lowed to resume her ttstdenSW Hanson. "B( Wouldn't Corao to rjML John J. Fldrldgn told JiMr.H Nettle F.ldrldgo refused ZSjB with him in June. 1308, andSM. has written a number of t uB her to come to him ahe huB so. They wero married i Nob.. December 12, 189J WhH sided until Juno 3. 130? nuB was compelled to comt 'to tfM count of his health. H In Kearney. nc Wan grantMI on tho ground of desertlorLiW ono child, which Is in thcntH mother. B Non-support Is the RrounA Martha A. Telford wB TmB vorce from .Samuel TelforiBi married In England FobtiutH She declared that since AtH her husband has provMeBB wards the support of her aiBI drcu. In addition to a dlrwSBI grunted the custody of ths JBBI $20 a month alimony. (SB Graeo H- Storing tcMlfid'tBM 11. .Storing has failed to iBB) over since May. 1903, and sbtBB ed a divorce. They wore ntBH Paul, Minn.. December 4, ImBH Poor Provider; 0hi Cruelty and non-suppoiTjB grounds upon which Sodla Jbfll divorced from John A. title. married June I, 1 yOG. She (mBI that her husband struck htrBB occasions and knocked htrBfl at ono lime drew a butcher lBB and threatened her life, HBB vllo and abusive luncuat-t Mflfl nnd for moro than a year mBB support her. They havo ons iBH the custody of which wai'iBB Mrs. Leek, with J1S a monttrBB I.llllau Ramsey testified tflfll Ramsey had failed to mppiBB thrco years, and that on AugaBB ho deserted her, since which BB hoard from him. She wasBB divorce and hor maiden nnnia'BB Orson A. Chaffee was trnuittBB from Allco E. Chaffee on UmBJ descrtton. They were rosrrfBfl city January 5, 1901. and 3fBJ deserted her husband NovqmBJ Ho did not know where tlie liBJ ont, but had heard from hciiflj and Montann. HJ Failure to support wu ilBfl upon which Myrtle S. WalkloBJ divorced from George A. WiBB whom she married SeptembtBJ She eald her husband nad imBH good provider and thnt alKiBJ vembei- ho had failed lo priftlBfl nt all. They have one chlM,fll she was granted the cmtota.'BB also awarded their houEChBB and $35 a month alimony. .H Mrs. Speight Gets 0H Mrs. Rose .Speight was sriH vorce from George Harold BB tho grounds of desertion uBJ port. They wero married InBB and Mrs. Speight declared tkBJ band deserted hor In SepUBJ since which he has failed, BB her. Sho was awarded f 800 BB $50 attorney's fees, tliesa uBB payable out of tho money WBB secured In settlement of tlttMB obtained by him against "BH Mountain Doll Telephone Bfl damages for personal IaJfBB while in Us employ. S(MBB that ho bad sold his interest. BJ ment, which was for more tBB to his mother, Mir. E. BB Mrs. Speight secured an IBfl tied the money up. The BB dissolved tho injunction uPBBl ment of tho sum of $Co0 to JBBI Mary A. llerllhy told & BB story to the court about BB cruelty of John Hcrlthy. QBBl rled In England In June. ! wns granted a divorce. SnBBI while she wns ill of nppendlelH ham In March of last -vefr,"BB refused to provide medlc&I for her and left her to die. -BB1 occasion, she said, he camBB a bottle of chloroform ftiBB to kill hor. In January jBB clarcd. be choked and cjSBBl names. She was also airAnMHI tody of the children. $25 a BB and $50 attorney fees. BB Reconciled; May DropVBJ Owing lo the fnllure of KfBB Glllls to appear In court "3BB tho caso against John C JBB oho Is suing for srparate "BH the order to show cause "BB until Monday, at which , tlm' "BB compelled to appear. It fJBB the attorneys In tho case tnlBB havo become reconciled nno u no doubt will be dla,nja'M:.BI Eight final decrees of ?,('!BJ tered by Judge Morse In VJ cases. Emma Fleming '. BH Ing. Maud Richards t. f2BB Jessie Mciss vs. Gcorre J?BB H. Bunnell vn. Mass Bu.nIrBB Jones vs. F. V.r. Jones. AnSB vs. J. S. Stevens, Henry 'BB Fort nnd C. F. Eyler v. B) |