OCR Text |
Show JUDGE BOWMAN DISAGREES WITH JUDGE WHITAKER Juris Whitakor of tho civil branch of the city court holds that usurious interest, in-terest, charged on loans made before tho anti-iii-urtous iutrosl law of 1007 was passed, can be veooverod. but Jndsc Bowman Bow-man of the pollco court dlKagreos. Tho Employees' Croilil compniiv recently re-cently brought suit in tho civil d'visfou of the city court apalnst C. E. Cropper on lx notes, ulven In lt'00. to secure, as nianv loan, acqroeailus: 517.00, on vUiJch 10 r cent a month interest was charged. A ctianse of judges was. asked for and .ludc f-iowninn heard iho caso. The auit was for SKM.U', $S6.."i2 yiorfi thsn tho amount of tho loons, aud when It was shown that Cropper had nlrcadv paid .'s." on a loan of only .''17.3m. Judge Hoivman said that Cropper had fullv settled set-tled Hie 'la I in, and entered Judgment against th'o loan aeenj |