OCR Text |
Show fMBTANDING OF THE PLAYERS 11 W IN THE MAJOR LEAGUES lIllBHans Wgnr of Pittsburg Nationals and "Napoleon" L&-Fij'Q L&-Fij'Q of Cleveland Americans L ad Country in Batting. !23aseball averages may bo misleading , the real student of the same, says an' astern sporting writer, but there is no sputing the fact that thousands, yes, nd tens of thousands of enthusiastic as in this ond every other town in the iuntry dearly love to spend their wln-,rs wln-,rs in pondering" over the figures which veal the supposed strength of their Lvorlte players, both as batsmen and aiders. The mere figures contained in an offl-i offl-i reume of the work done by a play-""during play-""during a championship season can-jt can-jt make a commonplace player look Kid to an unsentimental manager, for j a rule the most valuable man to a am is the man who forgets all about ie existence of an official scorer and imn9 and tries to play winning ball lthout thinking of what his averages ay be at the end of the season. In truth, It is the player who takes ie desperate chances and makes the rors on comparatively easy chances ho looks the best to his manager nnd ncrally finds himself on a winning am. But there are exceptions to all lies, and Inasmuch as the people who iy their way through the gates must ivo their favorites, the compiling and lbllshlng of the annual averages gen-ally gen-ally yield some interesting reading. This year In the National league there c only seven players who finished the ason with hatting records of .300 per nt or better. Hans Wagner of Pltts-irg, Pltts-irg, who led the league last year, leads again with a percentage of .341. , Pittsburg leads In team batting, and New York In extra bases, and steals. "Wagner Is the chief individual slugger and the star base runner. Taylor of New York and Brlggs head the pitchers in the field. Warner tops the catchers, Pletz the first basemen, and Raymer the second sackers. Jlc-Cormick Jlc-Cormick leads at third and Corcoran at short, while three outfielders managed to escape dropping any files. Three clubs finished the season tied for first rank in the fielding honors. To sum It all up, the batting has been below the standard, the .fielding more than good, and the base running above the average. The work of the pitchers ylelded.brllliant results. The American Lenguo. Napoleon Lajole of the Cleveland team again heads the list of batsmen in the American league Larry is once more the champion batter of the big circuit, which includes a large number of the really great batsmen in professional profes-sional baseball. Keeler of the Gotham Highlanders and Harry Davis and Hoffman of the Philadelphia Athletics both batted over the .300 mark)' But at that the list of genuino hard hitters is lamentably small. Dougherty of New York is the champion cham-pion run-getter of the league, and ho has scored more runs than any one individual in-dividual in either league. As regards the fielding the appended figures show that La Chanco of Boston leads the first batsmen, and that Dun-don, Dun-don, George Davis, Collens, Parent, El-berlleld, El-berlleld, Tannehlll, Fielder Jones, Lave Cross, Bradley and "Chick" Stahl played remarkably clever ball In the field. ! AMERICAN" LEAGUE BATTING AVERAGES. - Flavors- ' G. AB. R. BE TB. BA. Ba!1b. 3B. HR Laiole, Cleveland 140 552 03 20S 301 .370 .515 50 14 5 Stovall, Cleveland ff62 1D1 10 53 77 .Sol .510 9 11 Anderson. New York 143 447 01 353 21G .317 .400 23 12 3 Keeler. Now York 143 547 7S 3S5 21G .338 .374 13 G 2 Herring, "Washington 15 52 5 10 11 .313 .317 1 0 0 Holmes. Chicago CO 230 42 78 112 .312 .440 11 10 1 i Hoffman. Philadelphia '. ; 50 107 Gl GO S3 .201 .421 C I 3 Davis. Philadelphia 91 400 54 124 190 .303 .4G5 22 12 10 , Flick. Cleveland H9 077 05 175 258 . 303 .14S 31 IS 5 , Bradlev. Cleveland 151 612 91 1S1 252 .299 .412 31 8 6 C Stnnl, Boston 157 5SS 73 172 249 . 291 .421 27 22 3 h. Cross. Philadelphia 155 003 73 170 220 .291 .372 29 9 11 Mullln, Detroit 52 151 14 44 59 .291 .390 11 2 0 Hickman. Detroit, Clovcland 126 479 4S 139 211 .290 . 401 21 15 5 Parent. Boston 155 COG S4 173 202 .290 .339 21 10 6 Heldrlck, St. Louis : 133 Ml GO 147 1S3 .290 .333 17 S 1 Murnhv. Philadelphia 150 55C 79 1G1 2J7 .290 .444 29 IS Fillip New York 90 337 40 95 125 .2s2 .371 10 -l 2 i Doughcrtv, New York, Boston 155 G47 113 1S3 243 .231 .376 17 1 3 G SovboM, Philadelphia 142 012 54 141 200 .231 .391 25 11 3 Wallace, St. Louis 139 032 07 149 101 .2S0 .339 2S 4 2 Winston. Cleveland 10 50 12 14 10 .230 .320 2 0 0 Hemphill, St. Louis 113 435 47 110 333 . 275 . 30-3 13 2 2 1 Freeman. Boston 157 597 04 1G4 213 .273 .407 20 19 7 Collins. Boston 15G 029 S5 171 233 .272 . 373 33 13 3 Donovan. Detroit 43 140 12 33 45 .271 .321 2 1 1 Green. Chlcngo 147 52G 82 142 1SS .209 .357 20 11 2 Barrett. Drtrolt 101 G16 82 165 1 87 . 2CS" .364 12 5 0 McFarlan'l. Chlcaco 49 1G2 22 43 59 .2CG .364 10 3 0 ' S-lbach. Doston. "Washington 145 555 65 147 l&S .205 . 357 2S 12 0 Williams. New York 146 56L GO 149 2i .206 .355 31 t 2 Elborlleld. New York 122 447 55 US 14G .265 .327 12 o 2 J Stahl. Washington 112 520 53 13S 199 .265 .3S0 2S 12 3 Ganzel. New York 129 470 43 121 17S .264 ,3S0 1G 10 6 Sugden. St. Louis 10S 349 25 92 101 .204 . 293 6 3 0 Burkett, St. Loulo 147 07G 70 155 191 .261 . 33-3 3d 9 2 Callahan. Chicago 132 4S4 CG 126 150 .260 .SOS 20 2 0 LuHh. Cleveland 13S 479 57 124 157 .259 . 328 11 S 1 Wuddell. Philadelphia 43 100 0 18 21 257 .193 3 0 0 Davis. Chicago 153 OGG 75 141 200 .255 .353 2o 14 1 Smith, Chicago 24 71 S IS 25 .254 .352 G I 0 Mclntyrc. Detroit 152 579 74 147 1S3 .254 .310 12 9 2 Crawford. Detroit ,...149 063 50 143 204 . 234 .362 21 17 2 Chcsbro. New York . 55 172 IS 42 GO .254- .319 9 3 1 Qrth. Washington, Now York 67 170 3 3 4 3 51 .253 . 300 4 2 0 CouRhlln. Detroit. Washington 119 462 47 11G 140 .251 .318 22 4 0 Bender. Philadelphia 26 78 S 17 24 ,24S .309 3 2 0 Jones, St. Louis , 156 G24 53 1 51 195 . 247 . 315 16 10 2 Hartsd. Philadelphia 147 539 79 133 177 .247 . 317 14 11 2 Bruce, Philadelphia 30 101 9 15 27 .217 .2 2 0 0 Donahue. Chicago 101 370 40 91 112 .246 . 303 9 8 1 "Woods. Detroit 49 175 4G 43 57 .240 .326 7 2 0 Drill. Detroit. Washington 96 302 24 74 9-3 .215 .313 13 3 1 Huelsmah, St. L, Detroit, Chicago. Wash.. .109 39-3 23 97 133 . 245 . 338 21 o 2 Lcchnnce. Boston 157 573 56 130 167 .214 .279 19 4 1 Conroy, New York 141 491 5S 120 163 . 214 . 312 16 12 1 Plank, Philadelphia 42 12S 9 31 34 .242 .26G 110 F Jones, Chicago 151 5G1 74 136 171 .242 . 3fb 15 6 3 Robinson, Detroit 97 321 30 77 101 .240 .315 10 0 Cassldy. Washington 147 5S6 G2 141 191 .239 .324 13 17 1 Howell. St. Louis 3G 113 9 27 39 .23S .315 o 2 1 Padden, St. Louis 132 452 42 107 1 34 .237 . 274 17 d 0 Hync-fl. St. Louis C7 255 23 CO 73 .235 .2Sy 7 3 0 Turner. Cleveland Ill 406 41 95 IIS .231 .291 S G 1 Thoney. Washington. New York 51 3SS 23 44 55 ..231 .294 7 2 0 Klttrcdge. Washington SO 275 11 01 71 .233 .2.3 7 0 0 Hughos, Now York, Washington 30 111 11 20 40 .231 .360 5 o 1 Bay Cleveland 132 507 07 117 15S .232 .312 12 10 3 Henley, Philadelphia i 34 105 9 25 30 .231 .27S 5 0 0 Bcvllle. Detroit, Clovcland 53 173 1G -10 49 .231 .2S3 7 1 0 O'Neill. Boston. Washington 112 419 40 06 110 .229 .239 11 0 1 Dundon. Chicago 10S 373 40 85 99 -228 .265 8 3 0 Bonus. Clovcland . i 333 35 7G 9S .22S .201 30 C 0 SulIIvnn. Chicago .' I ..103 371 29 8-1 113 .226 38 -1 1 Pickering. Philadelphia 12-1 455 56 102 320 . 224 .2 32 3 0 L Tannehlll. Chicago 153 547 00 322 101 .223 .291 29 5 0 Donovan. Washington ..125 441 30 OS 101 .222 .236 G 0 0 Walsh. Chlcaco 17 41 5 9 15 .220 . 365 1 1 3 McCormlck, Washington ..112 405 36 89 102 , 220 . 252 11 1 0 Gleason. St. Louis 4-1 147 10 32 41 .21S .278 7 1 0 Fcrrla, Boston ..156 561 50 322 174 . 21S .310 21 U 3 Carr. Cleveland, Dotroit .....123 47S SO 104 131 .21S .274 39 4 0 Gremlnper. Detroit S2 SOS 18 GO SS .214 .2S4 33 3 3 TCahoo, St. Louis 70 233 9 00 OS .214 .249 G 1 0 Isbell. Chicago ... 95 319 20 GS SO .213 .2w. 11 2 1 Rosaman. Cleveland is Gl 5 13 17 '.213 . 279 4 0 0 Owen, Chicago . 37 303 10 23 SI .213 .2S7 2 0 2 0'Inry. Detroit ..131 456 39 97 11G .213 .o 10 3-1 Farrell, Boston C7 ttS 12 42 55 .212 .278 9 3 0 Hill St. Louis. Washington... 134 4S7 SS 103 313 -211 .232 8 1 0 Clarke. Washington .... . SJ 27f 23 5S GS .210 . 244 S 1 0 Voung. Boston ,.43 34S 34 31 43 .209 .290 3 3 1 Welnow. New York 62 206 12 43 59 . 209 . 2S7 8 1 0 Magulre. New York 99 320 27 07 S3 .209 .259 32 2 0 Kltson. Detroit 23 72 9 15 38 .209 .260 0 0 3 Dlner-n. Boston 37 3 20 9 25 27 .20S .225 0 1 0 lullon. Philadelphia. Washington 65 2115 24 41 55 .203 .260 fi 2 3 -oonan. Philadelphia 33 113 13 23 31 .203 .201 3 1 2 J. Tannehlll. Boston ; 45 323 13 25 39 .203 .321 2 t. 0 Lowe. Detroit ...140 518 47 105 132 . 203 . 255 1 5 6 0 Stovall, Detroit ."....." 21 05 5 31 13 . 200 . 236 0 1 0 Osteon Kuw York ; 2S 307 33 21 36 .193 .337 1 4 2 Altrock. Chicago 37 113 13 22 2-3 .193 .230 1 0 1 M Cro-s, Phlladolnhla 153 493 33 01 135 .191 .253 22 3 1 Echreck, Philadelphia 102 311 23 59 73 .190 . 253 9 1 1 Rhodes Cleveland 23 91 5 17 23 .187 .253 2 2 0 fllnd. St. Louis . 34 102 0 19 25 .186 .211 4 1 0 Powers. Philadelphia ; 65 191 11 36 39 .156 .201 3 0 0 Sudhoff, St. Lou In 2S S4 5 15 20 .379 .230 3 1 0 Donohup. Cleveland 35 3j05 12 IS 22 .171 .210 4 0 0 Powell. New York 47 147 11 25 32 .170 .211 3 2 0 Moran, St. Louis, Washington 141 506 32 93 114 .161 .106 14 . 1 0 rli;er, Boston ...97 203 31 01 00 .163 .226 10 5 0 T?vnen'1- Wnsbington 3S lit 6 20 27 .175 .230 4 0 1 Abbott. Cleveland 0 132 11 22 CO .167 .223 4 2 0 Bernhardt. Cleveland 33 126 fi 21 2S .167 .222 5 1 0 hlte. Chicago 30 76 7 12 14 .15S .1FI 2 0 0 -lover, St. Louis : , 3 71 5 11 11 .355 .155 0 0 0 nte?.rl3l' Cleveland ; 04 n 3 15 .153 .163 2 0 0 Griffith. New York jr, 41 3 6 S .146 .195 2 0 0 Kllllan, Detroit 40 1"7 S 3S 26 .342 .2A5 4 2 ' 0 Mooro. Cleveland 26 S7 6 32 35 .13S .172 3 0 0 PiV CJ?v$,nn.tl 27 76 3 10 12 .182 .15S 0 3 0 PVti-' SrLo,U.13 30 US 7 35 36 .327 .336 10 0 ii cnOVaf:hlni'lon , 41 127 R 16 22 .126 .173 2 2 0 iiess. Cleveland 34 ps 3 12 36 .122 .157 2 1 0 VnuT Bo2,lL.n 20 43 7 5 5 .116 .116 0 0 0 attorson, Chicago, , . 20 5.1 3 6 6 .102 . 302 0 0 0 MwP501 Washington 32 S3 5 S 30 .009 .114 2 0 0 riIf0' vcw York Washington 20 52 0 5 5 ,006 .00-3 0 0 0 Gibson, Boston 33 i01 5 C C .032. .032 0 0 0 f.gf NATION'AIi LEAGUE BATTING AVERAGES. tctBf t, G AB P. IT TB 2B 3D UTt PC SH SB :1flR' Doann1nr,r,?ItrSbUrF . . 132 490 97 171 255 41 14 4 .349 5 03 ,I5B BppjI n'.. CiIP1"n,l,1l New York 06 363 59 321 1G8 IS 30 3 .329 7 22 atfjflt & u Cincinnati ISO 031 71 166 233 20 13 5 .313 7 11 ?S Chanco 8ni,f0"13 & S23 41 101 153 3 5 31 5 . 313 7 6 &Wm Clwko Npu(1,T0rk 05 1SI 27 06 75 3 2 2 3 . 309 5 31 H T hB PMi lt,tavb.ur 353 615 97 185 2S0 Ml 12 3 .301 28 2S :Mm Thorn li'ine ih.lQi 140 m 00 14S 1C 25 n 4 7 15 iJffll McGnn; Bro okly n 9 3n 41 W i3l is 4 2 .290 C 13 0Hk Schulil."' lork 141 017 81 14S 200 2! 6 G .256 22 42 Od'vell r.VVnilt 126 465 SS 152 17S S 10 G .2S4 10 39 Bresnnh?i CvnnntL- ; l2fi 463 75 1 33 37S 22 30 1 .2S4 33 20 9B BS vc3 Tork 107 -102 SI 111 166 21 S 5 .2SI 3 13 (mam. smoot i V ork i'f k ico 207 10 5 i ,ki 22 21 SiMl Bcvhn Tc;,v,S, Is7 6S 193 23 c 3 2Sl 14 23 igW. Kellev Pinoior.k ; 130 471 S1 133 1CS 18 8 1 2Sl 20 33 iiH' Shannon S?TaU. 123 443 75 126 173 2L 13 0 ,2Sl 15 1C 2mW' Lumlov -n T.Lr? uls I33 000 84 140 159 10 3 1 .2S0 20 31 mam mlVy- Brooklyn 3G0 C77 79 1G1 217 23 IS 9 ,279 11 30 McCorralckK H., New York and Pltt8burg.. 120 441 63 123 173 19 11 8 279 7 19 Magee. Philadelphia 95 301 Bl 101 349 15 12 3 .277 7 11 Mertea, Now York 14S 533 S3 147 200 23 11 4 .276 22 47 Lush, Philadelphia , 302 3C9 39 lfti 336 22 S 2 .176 0 12 Lautorborn, Boston T. 20 G9 7 19 21 2 0 0 .275 1 1 Gleason, Philadelphia 353 0S7 61 161 396 23 6 0 .27l 35 17 Cooley, Boston 123 467 41 127 174 38 7 C .272- 0 34 Tcnnoy, Boston ltf 533 76 141 3S2 17 9 1 .270 22 17 Dahlcn, Now York 145 623 70 340 170 26 2 2 .263 11 47 Caaoy, Chicago l3G 043 71 147 178 20 4 1 .203 20 21 Brain, St, Louis 325 48S 67 130 399 24 12 7 . 200 9 IS Wolverton. Philadelphia , 102 39S 43 1C6 331 15 5 0 . 206 30 18 Evers, Chicago 352 632 4? -Ill 169 11 7 0 .205 23 6 Babb, Brooklyn 351 021 49 133 163 IS 3 0 203 10 34 McCarthy. Chicago 315 432 36 111 132 14 2 0 .261 17 14 Rltchey, Plttoburg 150 041 79 318 3S9 22 32 0 .263 37 12 Huggins, Cincinnati 140 491 06 329 161 12 7 2 .263 15 13 Loovor, Pittsburg 3-1 09 32 26 35 2 2 1 .263 2 0 McChcsnoy. Chicago 22 SS 9 23 33 G 2 0 261 0 2 Needham. Boston 78 2C9 18 70 Ko 12 3 4 .200 1 3 Slaglo, Chicago 120 4S1 76 13- 160 12 10 1 .200 7 28 Dillon, Brooklyn 351 011 CO 1C2 IS G 0 .253 9 13 Roth, Philadelphia GS 229 2S 59 72 8 1 1 .258 4 S Ewing, Cincinnati 80 97 9 25 30 6 1 1 .2oS 0 2 Leach. Pittsburg 140 579 ?2 149 194 15 12 2 .257 4 23 Abbatlcchlo, Boston ; 3&1 G79 vG lis 195 IS 10 3 .250 13 24 Shay, St Louis 98 340 45 S7 103 11 1 1 ,23G 7 35 Farrell. St, Louis 130 CO 72. ISO 159 23 3 0 ' .255 5 16 Batch, Brooklyn 2S 64 9 24 35 1 2 2 .255 2 6 Gilbert, W.. New York 146 47S 67 121 143 3 3 3 1 .253 10 33 Scbring, Plttoburg and Cincinnati 336 527 50 132 370 2)) 9 0 . 250 1 16 Dobba, Brooklyn 363 36 00 110 16 2 0 .24S 11 11 RIttor, Brooklyn ........ , G3 214 23 53 59 4 1 0 .24S G 17 Smith, H.. Pittsburg ;. 17 141 17 35 40 3 1 0 .248 3 5 Carlsch, Pittsburg 1 36 125 9 31 30 3 1 0 .248 1 a llulswltt, Philadelphia 313 406 36 99 121 11 4 1 .214 12 S Barry, Philadelphia and Chicago , 105 3S5 44 91 110 9 2 1 .211 12 14 BteJnfoldt, Cincinnati 9S 319 33 So 111.11 G 1 .244 14 36 Jones, D., Chicago 9T 336 41 S2 112 11 G 3 .244 -1 14 Gelor, Boston 143 ES0 70 141 105 17 2 1 .243 7 IS Kllng, Chicago 120 452 41 110 131 IS 0 2 .243 14 7 PelUs, Cincinnati S2 272 32 06 86 13 2 1 .243 -l 1 Dooln, Philadelphia r-.... l(M X5 41 6 123 11 4 G .2-12 3 15 Phelps. Pittsburg 1)2 302 23 73 SI 5 3 0 .242 12 2 Gilbort. J., Plttaburg 25 S7 13 21 21 0 0 0 .241 0 3 Shcckard, Brooklyn 343 E07 70 321 359 23 G 1 .239 38 21 Schlel. Cincinnati J1S 291 25 09S3S30 .237 4 7 Canncll, Boston 03 346 32 SI SS 5 1 0 .231 7 10 Jacklltsch, Brooklyn 23 77 S IS 23 3 1 0 .231 1 7 Dunleavy, St. Louis 01 172 23 40 EG 7 3 1 .233 1 S Bowerman, Now York 90 2S9 33 07 92 11 4 2 .232 7 7 O'Neill, ar., St. Louis 23 91 0 21 32 7 2 0 .281 G 0 Corcoran. Cincinnati 150 573 55 133 174 17 9 2 ,1W) 14. 19 Lynch, Pittsburg 2" 87 6 20 . 23 9 2 0 . 230 1 0 Burke, St. Louis . US 4(3 37 92 108 30 3 0 . 227 17 17 Moran, Boston 341 COS 20 90 119 11 3 4 .226 3 10 Mathewson, Now York 43 333 15 30 11 5 3 0 ,2'6 9 3 Mitchell. Philadelphia and Brooklyn , 3 100 12 2 1 32 4 2 0 .226 4 1 Hill, SL Louis 23 93 13 21 31 2 1 3 . 226 2 3 Wlltse. New York 25 67 10 15 22 2 1 1 .224 2 1 Bransllcld, Pittsburg 339 62(J 47 110 351 17- -9 0 .223 39 11 Lundgreu. Chicago SI 90 . 7 20 27 3 2 0 .222 2 1 Tinker, Chicago 141 438 55 108 155 12 13 3 .221 12 41 Doyle. Brooklyn and Philadelphia 72 2CS 2 67 77 11 3 1 .221 3 0 Donahue, Su Louis and Philadelphia GO 215 22 47 51 I 0 0 .219 2 10 Wicker, Chicago 00 155 17 34 35 1 0 0 .210 3 4 Byora. St. Louis 17 GO 3 13 13 0 0 0 .217 1 0 O'Neill. J., Chicago 49 ICS S 36' 44 5 0 1 .214 4 1 Brown, Chicago 27 SO S 19 2-1 3 1 0 .213 1 0 Zearfoss. St. Louis 25 SO 7 17 19 2 0 0 .213 0 0 Marshall, Philadelphia, Boston, New York.. 23 0 7 17 20 1 1 0 .213 0 2 Fisher, Boston 36 09 S 21 2S 1 0 2 .202 0 0 Flaherty, Pittsburg 31 101 9 22 39 3 "4 2 .212 4 0 Taylor, J.. St. Louis 41 133 9 2S 40 3 3 1 .211 1 3 Raymer, Boston 114 419 23 SS 109 12 3 1 .210 20 17 Barclay, St. Louis and Boston 327 -JGS 46 06 119 10 6 1 .203 13 17 Carney, Boston 70 279 2 1 57 C6 5 2 0 .201 S 6 Corrldon, Chicago and Philadelphia 31 93 7 39 21 2 0 0 .204 1 0 Williams, Chlcapo S4 1S5 21 37 43 4 1 0 .2C0 7 9 Warner, New York , S6 2S7 20 57 67 5 1 1 .139 7 7 Kruegcr, Pittsburg 75 263 34 52 05 6 2 1 .304 9 S Strang. Brooklyn 75 371 2S 52 6G 11 0 1 .192 4 36 Woodruff, Cincinnati S7 306 20 58 78 11 3 0 .193 11 9 McCormick, M.. Brooklyn 105 317 2S 01 77 C 4 0 .181 G 22 Welmcr, Chicago 37 115 6 21 24 3 0 0 .183 2 1 Bergen. Brooklyn Dl 329 17 CO CS 4 2 0 .182 9 3 Willis, Boston 49 IIS 9 27 30 3 0 0 .1S2 3 0 Jordan, Brooklyn 85 252 21 45 59 10 2 0 . 370 17 7 McGlnnlty, New York 51 142 10 25 33 4 2 0 .17G 32 1 Jones, O., Brooklyn i 4G 337 10 24 26 0 1 0 .175 4 4 Hahn, Cincinnati 35 99 7 17 21 2 1 0 .172 3 1 Brlggs, Chicago 34 01 G 10 20 1 0 1 .170 2 0 Duggleby. Philadelphia 32 82 7 14 23 3 0 2 .170 2 0 Sutthoff, Cincinnati and Philadelphia 31 91 S 16 21 1 2 0 .170 3 1 Case, Pittsburg 18 63 3 0 11 0 1 0 .170 0 0 McLean, St- Louis 24 Si 6 14 IS 2 1 0 .367 0 1 Hall, Philadelphia 4C 163 11 26 30 4 0 0 .1C0 3 6 Kcllum, Cincinnati 36 S2 13 13 20 3 2 0 .120 3 2 Harper, Cincinnati , 25 113 14 IS 26 4 2 0 .159 3 3 Cronin, Brooklyn 10 103 5 17 3 9 2 0 0 . 357 3 0 Taylor. Luther, New York 37 ICS 8 30 21 1 2 0 .157 G 0 Nichols, St. Louis 30 7 17 22 1 2 0 .156 0 0 Frascr. Philadelphia , 41 310 5 17 22 3 1 0 .155 6 0 McFarland, St. Louis : 32 99 S 13 17 0 2 0 .131 2 0 Poole. Brooklyn ... 24G23 8 9100 .120 S 0 Garvin. Brooklyn . 23 63 0 8 S 0 0 0 .127 3 0 Ames, Now York 1C 40 3 5 C 1 0 0 .125 0 0 Phllllppe, Pittsburg 21 65 4 8 8 0 0 0 .123 1 0 Scanlan. Pittsburg and Brooklyn 17 41 2 5 6 0 0 0 .122 0 0 Walker, Cincinnati 24 77 6 9 9 0 0 0 .110 2 0 Plttcnger, Boston , 33 321 2 33 33 0 0 0 .108 3 l Sparks, Philadelphia s. 26 76 0 S 9 1 0 0 .103 0. 0 McNlchol, Boston ." 17 43 3 4 4 0 0 0 .093 0 0 Wllhclm, Boston 30 100 3 7 9 2 0 0 .070 5 0 McPherson, Philadelphia 35 47 0 3 3 0 0 0 .C61 1 0 Miller, Pittsburg 30 40 2 2 2 0 0 0 .013 0 0 OFFICIAL TEAM BATTING. Clubs- G. AB. R. II. TB. 2B. 3B. HR. PC. SH. SB. New York 3o7 0150 744 1347 1773 201 CO 31 .62 ICG 283 Pittsburg 156 5160 675 1333 1746 3 61 102 35 . 25S 321 17S Cincinnati 157 5231 C92 1332 176S 3S9 92 21 .255 335 179 St. Louis 150 101 C02 1292 1671 175 CO 24 .253 129 1E0 Chicago 156 o 210 697 3 294 1GU 157 G2 22 .24S 141 227 Philadelphia 105 5103 671 1263 1G15 370 64 23 .24S 113 K9 Boston 3K5 6135 491 3217 3542 353 60 21 .237 301 143 Brooklyn 354 4917 497 3342 1452 159 53 15 . 232 329 2 |