Show UTAH CENTRAL L WA Foreclosure Suits Called Up Before Be-fore Judge hues Yesterday INTERVENORS PROVING D P GLASMANITS NERVE PARALYZES PARALYZ-ES TH COURT Sale of the Bonk of Salt Lake Assets Approved Objectors Withdrawing Withdraw-ing Two Divorces Granted Leh Thomas and Harry Simons Sent to the Reform SchoolNew Suits Filed Probate Business in the Federal Court Central Trust Cos Answer in Union Pacific Foreclosure The four suits for foreclosure or mortgages and bonds on the Utah Cen I tral railway and the several branches composing he road were called up before Judge Riles yesterday afternoon I after-noon The suits which were begun some thre years ago and were the cause of the road going into the hands ot receivers are a follows Thomas Marshall trustee for certain I bndholder vs the branch of the road I known as the Salt Lake Fort Doug la railway to recover 800000 with Interest from Jan 1 18S5 the Indebtedness Indebted-ness being represented by 800 bonds of 1000 each The Knickerbocker Trust company vs Salt Lake Eastern railway to recover 1200000 with interest from July 1 1888 amounting with costs to 1607950 represented by 1200 bonds of the denomination of 1000 each The Knickerbocker Trust company vs the Utah Western Railway company com-pany to recover 000000 and Interest amounting to 765850 The Central Trust company vs the Utah Central consolidation of the various va-rious branches to recover 9000000 on 5 per cent first mortgage bonds issued May 1 1891 and payable in 1921 RECEIVERS CERTIFICATES In addition to the four suits was the suit In intervention to foreclose receivers re-ceivers certificates to the extent of 100000 In February 1895 receivers having been appointed in the several suits brought by Marshall and the trust companies the court made an order companes cOlrt authorizing the receivers to issue receivers re-ceivers certificates to the extent of 100000 to operate the railroad lines i and keep the same in repair and provide pro-vide necessary rolling stock I was also provided that these certificates I should be first lien on the property I Certificates of that amount were issued I by the receivers and disposed of at par I Iclan and Bamberger holding about 26000 of these Intervened In I the principal actions on behalf of A I rsot I themselves and all other certificate holders to foreclose their certificates and have the same sold to satisfy them One of the questions the court will have to decide Is priority of liens The total claims with interest will foot up to nearly 15000000 There are a number of other inter venors who claim to hold judgments and liens against the road for small amounts and the proving up on those claims was commenced and just well I I Monday started when morning court adjourned until II GLASMANNS NERVE 1 The suit in intervention brought by I William Glasmann of Ogden for 1500 I eG ano3 no which he alleged was due on an un satisfif judgment which he had recovered re-covered in 1893 for land taken by the company for a rightofway Glasmann took the stand and was examined in reference to the mater I by his attorney George P Costigan I jr The examination proceeded satisfactorily I satis-factorily and Glasmann testified to i having recovered the judgment the j why and the wherefore and so forth and just at the conclusion his attorney attor-ney asked the witness I he had eve l received anything on account of the judgment The question seemed to sur priso the witness and he was a little r confused but with some hesitancy admitted ad-mitted he had received something This lead to further questions on the same line with the result that Glas mann admitted to the great astonishment aston-ishment of Judge Hiles and all the lawyers in the case including Mr CosUgan that the judgment which he was seeking to have declared a lien against the company had been fully I paid and satisfied In every respect Such an unusual denouement seemed to fairly non pIus Judge Hiles and the attorneys were both astonished and amused at the effrontery of Glasmann His honor thought he had had enough for one day and It being nearly 5 oclock court adjourned till Monday morning QUESTIONS OF REMUNERATION I Prior to the Glasmann incident Receiver Re-ceiver McGregor was examined with reference to the compensation he had received for his services as such receiver re-ceiver which he said was 300 t month and other accounts of the operation of the road were gone Into with some detail The receipts of the road during his receivership amounted to 36160673 36364141 and the disbursements to Mr P L Williams the attorney for the road was examined In regard to what he would consider a fair remuneration re-muneration for the master who will probably be appointed to sell the road and Mr Williams thought 5 per cent remuneration of the selling price would be a fair rmuneraton |