Show a UNPAID AII3XONT The Case of Thurgood vs Xliunro Again Comes Up Tho old divorce case of George E Thur I good vs Charlotte E Thurgood which was tried in 1889 15 to be opened up again in the near future At the time of the granting of the decree to Mrs Thurgood on her crosscomplaint she was allowed alimony in the sum of fl193 but she was unable to collect it In an affidavit filed before Judge Bartch yesterday Mrs Thurgood alleges that the only sum ever collected on the Judgment was f75 and the United States marshal kept that for v his fees Joseph Uppman was appointed efereetO examine Thurgood as to his l 1 Q a j a property in 1891 and he reported that f Thurgood had nothing that could be applied ap-plied on the judgment Mrs Thurgood now alleges that he had property at the time and still has it and that she will prove that fact if given an opportunity Judge Bartch granted the request of Mrs Thurgood that her exhusband be again cited TO anpear and answer in relation to his property Judge Tatlock was appointed special master 1 and the examination will be held before aim next Friday |