OCR Text |
Show DECISION AGAINST COMMERCIAL 61 K I la uj opfaloa readcrrd yoUrnlay. tb f-aprcaf; coa.n ordeo a CKxiirka- Hoa of tb docret estorcd la the dii-1 dii-1 trict court la th cc of Kliu D. St oil axalaat the Cotanacrda NnUoaal bank, so aa to Jncrai the idta? ot I In faror of the plaintiff from I1J1 2 l to $ ll as. j vMra. Stoll aed to rocorr raoscy : allox d U bare boen paid out oa hrr account without her cooaoat to A. D. B Itojaoll, who eiaiHl to act aa hor ajjoat. It araji ibown that Hajncll had vl a power of attorney (a draKia th aor.r aad that Mr. Stoll bad aTr irlca lb la pom-r Tho lower court Kranted bor 15 nod she p-pM, p-pM, AJktaR for IPW.75 additional The aapreair eottrt flnda that the BWHwy paid oat un waaathorlzed and -aa paid oat by lb bank after Mm Stoll had aerred nolle on the bank j that no cb&ck aInt her account re to be honored unln they con-Latad con-Latad bor oa alnatar aad Indorse-mnnL Indorse-mnnL Acoordlnrly, thv Joor court In onlcrel to naodify its dore In accordance accord-ance ith that fIndlaR. In anotbor opinion rndfd yoatr-day yoatr-day tbci aprai eort rornraos tho to'or court In th ca of JoaApk A. Obroct agalam th N'IImib IihI & Water company. Ob red iwod to oa-forco oa-forco tho tnrmi of a contract. |