OCR Text |
Show Construction activity for Davis County a 71 percent climb over last year. Nonresidential construction, took In Woods Cross, one hor$eWs approved, a 75 percent drop,lts $60,000 valuation reflected a 61 : percent decline. Nonresidential ac- ? tivity stood at $290,000, an 83 percent per-cent decline. , ,The unincorporated county saw -no, residential" permits given. -Nonresidential construction or $13,600 took place, a 51 percent drop. CLEARFIELD - For Davis County as a whole, construction activity ac-tivity during January through March Mar-ch of 1989 didn't measure up to 1988 levels for the same months. The $16.9 million recorded for residential and commercial activity fell more than 18 percent short of 1988 levels, said Jack Bailey, t manager of Clearfield Job Service. The declines were fairly signifi- cant in some areas, while other communities posted construction increases, however. Residential construction totalled $11.2 million, an 8.5 percent drop, while nonresidential construction came in at just under $4 million, for nearly a 37 percent decline. Construction activity for Davis County communities included: k Bountjful construction stayed even with the previous year for residential activity, at 18 units. The residential construction was valued at $2.7 million, a 22 percent increase. in-crease. Nonresidential activity totalled $110,000 an eight percent rise. Centerville's 12 residential units represented a nine percent increase, in-crease, with the $1 million valuation valua-tion reflecting a 23 percent climb. Nonresidential construction stood at only $12,500, but was a near-eight percent increase. Seven residential units in Clearfield represented a 250 percent jump, with the $386,000 valuation showing a 258 percent climb. Nonresidential Non-residential construction of $198,000 was an 84 percent drop. Clinton's 13 new residences for the quarter showed a 333 percent increase, with their $779,000 valuation valua-tion a 253 percent jump. Non-residential Non-residential construction of $150,000 showed an 18 percent increase. ' The eight residential units approved ap-proved in Farmington in January-March January-March were a 100 percent increase, with the $624,000 valuation a 27 percent move upward. Nonresidential Nonresiden-tial construction, at $1.7 million, showed a huge 158, percent increase. in-crease. In Fruit Heights, no construction construc-tion activity of any kind was reported. Kaysville's 16 residential units meant activity was down 16 percent from a year earlier. At a $1.6 million valuation, however, the homes were valued at 44.5 percent more than activity a year ago. Some $93,000 in nonresidential activity was reported, an increase of more than 999 percent over the previous year. In Layton, 46 residential units were registered, a 36 percent drop. Their $2.6 million valuation was a 48 percent drop. Nonresidential construction was listed at only $3 16,000, a 68 percent decline. , North Salt Lake's two homes equalled last year, while the $186,000 valuation was an 11 percent per-cent increase. Nonresidential construction con-struction topped $1 million, more than a 999 percent increase over the same period a year ago. j . In SouUvWeber, the two home'' constructed reflected a 75 percent drop from 1988, The $374,000 valuation reflected a 49 percent drop. No nonresidential construction construc-tion was reported. Landlocked Sunset reported no residential or nonresidential activity. activi-ty. In Syracuse, two homes were given permits, a 50 percent drop, with the $101,000 valuation also a 50 percent decline. Non nonresiden-: tial activity took place during the! quarter. ' . ., Two homes were also registered in West Bountiful, for a," 33 percent drop. The $98,000 valua-' tion reflected a 35 percent decline. Just $15,000 in nonresidential activity ac-tivity was reported, a 94 percent drop. ! ,. ' , J In West Point, 10 homes were ' given construction permits for the v period, a 43 percent increase over 1988. Their $620,000 valuation was :r |