Show Vail Cott VK O P Pratt Waldemar Van Cott appellant vs O P Pratt defendant Salt Lak City respondent Judgment of the lower court affirmed af-firmed Opinion delivered byI1cle Bartdh and concurred in by Judges Smith and King In September 1894 the appellant oBtained ob-tained judgment against the defendant defend-ant Pratt In the district court for 402 80 which sum is still unpaid A garnishment gar-nishment was duly served on the garnishee gar-nishee and return made showing there was 100 due from the city to defendant defend-ant Appellant moved for judgment on the arnishees return and the rnihes te city waived its exemption from garnishment garnish-ment and expressly recognizing such garnishments In the court below it was claimed that the city could not legally do his Eventually Judge Mer ritt denied the appellants motion and I the appeal was from that order |