Show THIEDE MUST HANG HAG Supreme Court Denies the Motion Mo-tion For a New Trial DOCTOR HASBROUCKS CASE ACT REGULATING PRACTICE OF MEDICINE CONSTiTUTIONAL Other Opinions Handed Down By the Snpreme Conrt A Decision Against Sheepmen nnd Their Use of the Highway B Miiner Appointed United States Commissioner at Provo in Lien of A O Smoot Resigned Re-signed Miscellaneous Easiness The territorial supreme court met in adjourned session at 1 oclock yesterday yester-day morning Chief Justice Merritt and Associate Justices Bartch Smith and King on the bench A number of opinions were handed down and some minor business transacted Thiede Must Be Hanged The most important opinion handed down was that on the motion for a new trial for Charles Thiede convicted on October 21 1894 of the murder of his wife at Murray on the night of April 30 1894 The opinion was delivered by Judge King denying the motion and was concurred con-curred In by Chief Justice Merritt and Associate Justice Smith The opinion is a very exhaustive one The motion for a new trial tvas based on alleged insufficiency of evidence I evi-dence to justify the verdict that the II verdict was contrary to the evidence and to the law errors in the admission i of some evidence and the exclusion of i other evidence error in overruling the defendants objection to going to trial ion i-on October 10 1894 for the reason that i the evidence taken at the preliminary hearing had not been transcribed I certified and filed with the clerk of the I district court errors in overruling i challenges of jurors error in permitting permit-ting Louis Gronosky one of the jurors ito i-to act as interpreter for two witnesses errors In the judges charge to the I Jury and numerous other alleged errors i of law I With reference to the exception I taken on the point of allowing Juror I Gronosky to act as an interpreter for I certain witnesses the court said I There is no pretense that the Juror acted other than honestly and fairly I it is not even hinted that his Interpretation I interpre-tation was faulty or biased With this record upon this question I would be 1 monstrous perversion of justice to hold that this action of the court was reversible re-versible error The opinion closes with the statement state-ment We are of opinion that the case was fairly presented to the jury We find no error in the record and accordingly accord-ingly affirm the judgment of the lower court and remand the case with directions di-rections to the lower court to fix the day for carrying Its sentence into effect ef-fect J feetA stay of twenty days was granted ingMessrs In which to file a motion for a rehear I Messrs Cherry c Cherry the defendants de-fendants attorneys will if the motion I for a rehearing is denied carry the case to the Supreme court of the II United States The unwelcome news of the decision was imparted to Thiede during the I afternoon and he received it with the I same stolid Indifference he has manifested mani-fested throughout I will now be the duty of the lower court to again fix a day for the hanging hang-ing of the unfortunate man |