OCR Text |
Show RULE DAY Number of Cases Will Be Subject to Call. Monday, October 1, will bo rule day in tho Federal courts, and tho follow- i ing cases will be subject to call: Lawsou vs. United Stales Mining company. Tclluridc Power company vs. Provo Cily. Morgan vs. Van Orden. Gloyd vs. Southern Pacific company. Oliver vs. Bingham Cit' Mining and Smelting company. Parry vs. United Stateo Smelting coinpanj'. Western Pacific Railroad company vs. Dunbar. ) Myers R. S. company vs. Intermoun-lain Intermoun-lain lining company. Nixon vs. Southern Pacific company. Toltcc Ranch company vs. Central Pacific company. . D wight vs. Stopler. Herschel Gold Mining company vs. BolhweJl. Conley vs. Consolidated Mining and Smelting company. Rich et al vs. Western Pacific company. com-pany. McClcavy vs. American Smelting and Refining couipanj-. Ogdeu Waterworks company vo. Og-den Og-den City. Sheets vs. Preferred Accident Insurance Insur-ance company. Burke vs. Topping. In ro Frisbey, bankrupt. U, S. Scorup. In ro Richens, bankrupt. United States vs. Stevens. In re Alff, bankrupt. Sampson vs. United Stales Mining compan3 Clawson Vs. Van Order. United States Mining company vs. Lawsou. Kroupa vs. American Ozokerite Manufacturing Man-ufacturing company. Maekay vs. Utah Consolidated ot al. Wall vs. Tclluridc Power company. Carlisle vs. Utah Consolidated. Capcll vs. Southern Pacific company. Uinnau vs. Wilkerson. Buckhorn Ore company vs. Ivern. Buckhorn Ore company vs. Kern. McGee vs. American Smelting and Refining company. Orceon Packing company vs. Wasatch Wa-satch Orchard. Kachatouis vs. Utah Fuel company. Tarbet vs. Nunn. Crookstou vs. Utah Copper company. Brummitt vs. Ogdeu Waterworks compan3'. Hill ys. Utah Consolidated. In re Butler, bankrupt. United States vs. Magleby. United States vs. lluish. In re Graehl, bankrupt. |