Show TROUBLE OVER BRICK PLANT Charles Digges et al Want Damages from Consolidated Implement Co V The case of Charles Digges ct al vs the Consolidated Implement company was on trial yesterday before Judge Cherry with Attorney IT C Edwards representing the plalnlllT and Attorneys Attor-neys Stephens Smith the defendant The action was brought to recover G1GO damages The plaintiffs alleged that they bought from the defendants a brickmiking plant for 13650 to be paid in Installments und the title to the property to remain In the defendant company until the full amount was paid The plant was In Cache county and the plaintiffs moved It to Bountiful Bounti-ful It is then alleged that the defendant de-fendant before any of the installments became due and before any breach of the contract occurred took possession of the property without right and dc prlvod the plaintiftB of It to their damage dam-age in the sum of J0150 By way of answer the defendant company claimed that under the contract con-tract It had a right to take possession of the property at any time It bplloved the payment became insecure that such an envrgeney arose when one of the purchasers C M Graves absconded ab-sconded Defendant allege that It has been damaged by the removal of the machinery from Cache county lo the exteht of 950 and on crowcomplaint claimed Judgment for that amount The hearing was In progress at the hour of adjournment |