Show PROVO PARAGRAPHS Dc hlon in the Celebrated Water Cnse PROVO Jan 3Judge King held court this morning and disposed o < the following business R C Hebertsn vs J C Nelson favor o plaintiff for 50 and costs iI Almon Roblson vs Peter Greenhalgh H motion for possession of property denied de-nied Isaac Cook vs Gllson Asphaltum company demurrer overruled Edward Lewis vs Almo Mining company com-pany two cases defendant given fifteen fif-teen daTS additional time to plead The people vs the Town of Vernal plaintiffs given sixty days t prepare and serve fctatement on motion for new trla1 The people vs McCune motion for new trial argued and denied defendant defend-ant fined 10 and costs thirty days stay granted t prepare and serve Btatenient on motion for a new trial The following United States cases were dismissed Nathaniel Edmunds unlawful operation of coal mine James Yonreson adultery James Searles fornication t Charles Harris unlawful cohabit r Ion cohabitation Hebtr Ayers adultery and unlawful Benjamin Goddard unlawful cohabi tation eter Anderson unlawful > cohabitation cohabita-tion ton rank Alvin Calvin adultery Isaac Pierce adultery Joseph Fisher unlawful cohabitation The following territorial cases were also dismissed People vs R F RIss man assault to commit rape People vs J C Moore et aI forgery People vs Jacob Yates battery People vs Adam Swaggart burglary People vs James Powers grand larceny lar-ceny People vs Thomas Moore resisting an officer People vs John Johnsor grand larceny lar-ceny People vs Georce McKinney burglary bur-glary two cases People vs Patrick Foster perjury People vs Arnold Castor grand larceny lar-ceny two cases People vs Henry Marshall rape People vs Annie Marks resisting an I officer murder rt ople vs Phil Foote assault to 5HE WATER CASE The lone and tedious litigation between be-tween the several canal companies of Salt Lake county and the farm owners alone the shores of Utah lake ha at last teen decided by the courts The first case is entitled Peay et al vs Salt Lake Canal company et al and was referred to referees Jadge Shurtliff of Ogden Amos Holda ay of Provo and J E Taylor of Salt Lake These referees re-ferees sat at different times and places and heard a great deal of testimony but the case was finally compromised by allowinc the land owners 6000 as damages Jilt Lake city et al then brought suit against Joseph H Cool edge et al to have the compromise noint defined Judge King in handing down his oolnion on this case said that the evidence evi-dence which had been introduced was not satisfactory and therefore he could not decide satisfactorily to both parties that i the canal company were allowed to put plank In the dam the lake a great many people along shore would suffer On the other hand if the dam was not maintained a great many peonle in Salt Lake county would suffer for want of waiter for their farms The contract Is hlndlng upon both Parties The canal com nanies have taK n away obstructions from the dam to the amount of twen tvfour and a half inobes and Insisted that the could maintain twentytwo Inches The canal companies are at lberb10 dace back as much obstruction obstruc-tion as thev had taken away The court gives to Salt Lake county the right to maintain eight inches In the old dam or fourteen inches in the new dam the new dam being six Inches lower on sU than the old dam Salt Lake countv contended for twentytwo inches on the new dam NOTES Marrlajre licenses were granted yesterday yes-terday to William F Cable aged 33 of Lake View and Mar L Cooper aged 21 of Salt Lake city John T Gardner aged 24 of Highland and Margaret Miller aced 22 of Lehi W R Mes blK aged 22 of Mammoth and Ada Blackett aged 19 of Thistle F E Beaman aped 25 and Katie Falkner aged 19 both of Mammoth State Senator M I Warner from Utah county goes up to the metropolis metropo-lis this afternoon Mr Warner will be domiciled at the Knutsford |