Show Steinke vs Graves The other opinion In the case of Theodore Theo-dore G Steinke receiver of the Cass County Iowa bank appellant vs r H Graves was written by Chief Justice Jus-tice Zane and concurred In by Justices Baitch and Miner and holds that tho court erred In sustaining defendants objection to the record and in entering judgment against the plaintiff The Judgment appealed from was therefore reversed and the cause remandeti with directions to the court below to grant a new trial The action was to recover 349140 on a promissor note executed by the defendant de-fendant Graves In the lower court the defendants counsel objected to the admission ad-mission In evidence of the transcript that the plaintiffhad been showing pla1n1Ir bCfn appointed ap-pointed receiver of he bank because it f O was signed by a deputy and not by the I cleric l of the court In Iowa himself The objection was sustained and a nonsuit granted from which ruling the appeal was taken The supreme court held that a deputy public officer could legally le-gally do a ministerial act like signing the paper In question although he could not do a judicial act The opinion opin-ion therefore held that the deputys act was valid |