OCR Text |
Show Iverson Considers Development i inursuay, uciouer o, iso Jjui -'V - "could, not would, be an excess." "Perhaps I would rather not see such a development go in," he admitted, "but that is purely subjective. Objectively, if a thorough impact analysis shows the project to be viable, it would not be likely that I would oppose it. I would probably even be willing to work with the developers de-velopers in planning it so that it would be jn the community's best interest. "If the project did induce growth beyond the minimum we need to be self-sustaining, and did erode the quality of life in Park City as I define it, my only alternative would be to slip on my pack and quietly leave town." In last week's article on the Deer Valley Development, Wayne Iverson was represented as . feeling that the proposed development de-velopment would be an excess. More accurately, he believes, "The Deer Valley-Lake Flats ski resort could, not would be an excess. If there were not sufficient demand for such activities and the project went bankrupt, as several ski areas in Utah have. Park City would be hurt since it would be even more difficult for anyone else to get any type of loan. But a good marketability study would show if such an undertaking would be economically feasible." Iverson's opinion is that, "Park City should grow to a point where it can sustain itself nicely and then stop. Any additional growth would be at the expense of the quality of life that makes Park City such a fine place to live. Park City may be at or near such a point now, and the proposed development," he repeated, |