OCR Text |
Show i Frllch case la a famous one. and ha j been on trial before Judgo George .!. Armstrong several days. 1 The company owned a piece ut property on Main street, between Klrst j North street and Hillside avenue. Tho ' grade on this property was changed j In ISO!), and the company built a e- talnlng wall and made other Improvements Improve-ments to conform. Then the grade was changed again by the council March 1G, 1003, and the Frltch company com-pany alleged this damaged their property. prop-erty. They filed a claim ror t'lti.hm damages with the council, but were turned down on October 17. 1904. Af-terwurd Af-terwurd suit was instituted in the district dis-trict court for 120.000 damages, nnd the case has been hanging fire in tho courts since that time. CITY MUST PAY DAMAGES FOR CHANGE OF GRADE Frltch Investment Company Is Given Verdict for $1,841.67. Salt Lake. Jan. 29. As a result of the bungling of tho city grades, the Frltch Investment company yesterday received a Judgment of $1,841.67 against Salt Lake City. The Jury gave the Frltch company $1,625 in damages with $216.67 ' interest. The |