| OCR Text |
Show TUMI CASES IE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT Tho supremo court will havo under consideration a total of thirty-nino cases during tho May term, which begins be-gins next Monday. The court will then sit in Its new organization, flvo judges for tho first time having the cases under consideration. Tho personnel person-nel of tho bupremo court now is Chief Justlco J. E. Frlck, and Associate Justices Jus-tices W. M. McCarty, E. E. Corfman, S. R. Thurman and Valentino Gideon. Tho sotting of cases follows: May 14 R. H. Pcalo, respondent, vs. H. P. Clark, appellant; Utah Association Associa-tion of Credit Men, respondent, vs. R. N. McConnell, appellant; Parrot Bros.' company, appellant, vs. Ogden City, respondent. May 16 Sheldon C. Mutart, respondent, respond-ent, vs. Arthur Pratt, warden, Utah stato prison, appollant; tho matter of tho estate of E. D. Swan, J. Ii. Mc-Ewan Mc-Ewan and others, respondents, vs. Johanna Jo-hanna C. J. Anderson, appellant May 16 G. M. Bartholomew, appollant, appol-lant, vs. C. H. Pickett, respondent; Thomas W. Blackburn, appellant, vs. Swan Olson and othors, respondents; David Jensen, respondent, vs. Nols Jensen, appollant. May 17 Joseph R. Sharp, appellant, vs. Georgo C. Whltmoro and others, respondents; Alvlna Steggoll, respondent, respond-ent, vs. Salt Lake & Utah Railroad company, appellant; Claudo M. Deo, respondent, vs. San Pedro, Los Angeles Ange-les & Salt Lake Railway, appollant. May IS Jacob Jensen, rospondont, vo "P AT Anrlnronn nnnnllnntf T.rnrlnn W. Rosenthyno, appollant, vs. J. A, McCullough and othors, respondents; Badger Coal & Lumber company, respondent, re-spondent, vs. N. C. Olson and others, appellants. May 21 Passow & Sons, appellants, ' vs. W. L. Wothorbco and others, respondents; re-spondents; A. Dahlquist, respondent, vs. Denver & Rio Grando Western Railway company, appellant; Rio Grando Lumber company, respondent, vs. E. W. Darko and others, appol-lants. appol-lants. May 22 Joseph S. Allen, respondent, respond-ent, vs. H. S. Allen, appellant; board of education of Cache county, appellant, appel-lant, vs. Georgo S. Dalnes, treasurer, respondent; in tho matter of the estate es-tate of Joshua Hono. respondent, vs. the stato of Utah, appellant. May 23 J. W. Burton, appellant, vs. Peter A Mattson and others, respondents; respond-ents; L. L. Coray, administrator, appellant, ap-pellant, vs. Perry Irrigation company, respondent; Pacific Land & Water company, respondent, vs. Albert E. Hartsough and others, appellants. May 21 In the matter of the estate es-tate of Peter Hansen, Mrs. J. Zenger, appellant, vs. Cigarmakors union No. 221 jand others, respondents; A. J. Brewer, respondent, vs. Walter Rom-noy Rom-noy and others, appellants; Ketchum Coal company, appellants, vs. Pleasant Valley Coal company and others, respondents. re-spondents. May 25 Lake Shore Duck club, appellant, ap-pellant, vs. Lake Vlow Duck club, and others, respondents; W II. Evans, respondent, re-spondent, vs. J. N. Jensen and othors. appellants. May 28 John W. Beasley, respondent, respond-ent, vs. Thomas Boardman. appellant; Thomas W. Blake, appollant, vb. Boston Bos-ton Dovolopment company and others, respondents; C. LeRoy Anderson and othors. respondents, vs. Grantsvillo Irrigation Ir-rigation company and othors, appellants. appel-lants. May 29 Harold Van Cott, appellant, appel-lant, vs. J. A. Casper and others, respondents; re-spondents; tho Murray Laundry, appollant, ap-pollant, vs. Salt Lake & Utah Railroad company, respondents; Margaret B. Conncll. appellant, vs. O. S. L. Railway Rail-way company and tho Pullman company, com-pany, respondents. May 31 Annie Cleary, appellant, vs. Amelia Daniels and others, respond-nni- M J Clearv. annellant. vs. Ame lia Daniels, respondent, and the Price IrrlgaUon company, Intervenor; J. W. Coburn. respondent, vs. Vera Bartholomew, Barthol-omew, appellant. |
