| Show VARIOUS VARIUS COURT CASES Wilam J Williams IB II being sued tot foe divorce by his hil wife Wll Kuth R Ihu mm 1110 wray for alimony and ald the of or her four young oung children and habitual drunkenness art Ir alleged UN reasons tor I the th de decree decree cree The t Jk place pinel in Nov No 10 Frank J an 81 trust in bUnk bank bankruptcy lut y for tor the creditor of It Matthews has commenced suit Hult against wife wll Ab all L al J Matthews to 10 annul a 1 conveyance by I deed from Matthews to his wife ut l 10 of ground facing ea eft t un n fourth West street between North NIth Tumult and First North U I Is I ged that the d was executed for of 01 Sl 1 on Jan 13 1 when M w II ni In n t to numerous Judgment unions them Man Ial K of or tha tJ tale of ot l M In the mini of If 50 i on ri ria a growing grow In of oC 1 olt a 1 hone deal The lh the making of the Ihl deed by h Matthew wan In fraud of ot bin hil creditor and the trus lus tee IN prays that Hut the conveyance hI get ut alle A similar suit el w Involving other property was tried and submitted for tor decision last weak we Judge Hall yesterday afternoon dlf dl II the milt brought by h V I Dolphin and Theodore 0 O Wolf of ot Scranton 11 a the Niagara Mining and Smelling company and the I t S Mining company at plaintiffs cost rOHI without prejudice on In stipulation of ot the opposing attorneys The rhe null was commenced a 1 month ORO IIO the appointment of ot a 1 was asked fur tur a I decree adjudging the absorption of the Niagara lola property by hy the Ihl t s R company compan u The he plaintiffs plain tiffs ll mcA as al minority shareholders rH of ot Niagara company A week no so tho defendants answered al rec the complaint com by b all al of the material ma allegations and l up that tha the th Interests of or Dolphin and uIl Wolf Wol In Il the tho Niagara ara am property l II an nn M A Instead of ot n a dividend The hearing on un the for appointment of n continued until the end of the tho com comIng Ing In Werl we l In order to defend defendants ants time to pet get deposition from Hos Hoston los ton und and the of or tho suit sl ye ys yet t came as OA a 1 surprise to those who were expecting to ec a f hurp I Ral battle on the duy I of or hearing Ice the tw defendant nt companion seemed anxious of the Dey 1 Street were counsel for tor the plaintiff and Kill Kills gis and alc W M r appeared a 11 for the defendants but none Mil of or them would disclose II rIMe the for tur the al 1 of the notion noton Man Manager ager gor for the th United Stales company cOllan declared that his hiI company hall had not bought the Block of or the plain plaintiffs tiffs It and gave ra 0 ns OH tio reason for Cor Ue sudden termination of oC thu tm suit that the Ul hall had concluded they had no cause of action In the premises J W Heywood was I brought brou ht by b Judge Hall Hal yesterday afternoon to a realization tion of ot what a n serious matter It la Is to disregard dl reat an order of oC the court Mrs Mr Heywood obtained a n divorce re recently reo centy and was waR awarded 25 a 1 month alimony almon by Jy stipulation Mrs Irs Heywood 1 nd the child chil of at whom nho wua glen given the custody left leCt town noon HOOt after and ald Hoy Heywood wood refused to pay poy her attorney W n tho first Installment of the tie alimony ut Insisted that he would pay It I only anI to Mrs Mr Heywood In person his object being he said to force fore Mm MIK Heywood to stay In Halt Hall Lake with wih their child which he desired to see at least occasionally In conse consequence consequence quence ho he wan wal cited to ho why wh he should not bo Je punished for contempt Tho court cited the fact Heywood had agreed to pay pa alimony and wild that when a man made malI such nn ment the mono money there was no nb excuse for him to not pay It The lle pay payment ph ment the court could either have hao been made tH Into Inlo court ourt or 01 to Mrs lr Heywoods attorney The Tho plea of ot the defendant that ho he would pay It H to Mr Ir Heywood only olly will wi not nt avail Tho fhe or orders r ders of ot the court must lw he respected re There Thero Is too much disposition to trill with the tho court In theeo matters and unless ulless Ita I orders arc complied with wih I have to Indict uch punishment as will compel their oh The wi Curt court then ordered the defendant to pay pa the thc money Into court and jQ costs at nt once The fhe money monc was W paid Testimony In tho divorce case of Jennie M Snyder vs R John H I was Wil taken yesterday afternoon by Jy reCer Armstrong who will wi recommend recommend mend the of or the decree |
