OCR Text |
Show Statistics Show Gain of 45jf f cent Cor Three Years mV Utah. -f . , BKUWKR3ES OF STATE I USING NATIVE BAP- inijiortalions oi' Malt Deeififif Locally Manufactured duel Increases. W. State Statistician II. T llniirlllfP? compiled figures showing that thelffjjOr ory business iu l'tah increased 3'--cent from 1005 to MIO. IT n The number of barrels of bcowJill nfactnri'd in the slate m 100?;. Jc l-Ll.fjD-l. as compared to 09.177 Wr for 190,". The value of the bocrf prrSB faclured in lJins is estimated Hfl" 010,021, as compared to $731,32 lllOo, an increase of L,t597. TkV -.0t volume of business of tho lirowcijl' 1WU.S was $I.-100.37S.sa, as ugniuaUtJ'-116 $n I. .155.31 for 10O5. This is fifcjll. growth of business, especially injT u of the fact that thero are "onlto. more breweries now than in 19fjt While the data does not 3hdtjoa number of breweries in the sta?-shows sta?-shows tho amount of capital iuV.' ',. lt, Tho total capital invested m thoJjf,u. . ing business in Utah in 190S wsTur tW1 5(1.1.070.23, as against $9$0,&19.ffi-"nt 1005, divided as follows; llo.b 10MS. IkTi f0 aluo of buildings litiM and grounds f?fl-it owned $ 033,757.60 $402' Value of ma- kfeiC'i chlnery, tools, Jfes"0 etc 150.57S.G0 201,1 JlS Value of all Sfj'iri other property JpJ Invested In the Rtfl-business Rtfl-business 170,759. SI ri86irJ Total capital W Pn Invested ...$l.n6l,07G.23 5 Data Gratifying. W;1 Tho data as to the quantity ofifTa used is gratifying in that itshowf while tho quantity of barlov ufVtf 100S was less than in 1005, ihzfyVSL product was used almost to thoJi sion of outside barley. Tho totrtjft.. uc of barley consumed in bcerr, ing in 100M was only $56ai7iffo. against .ji(1204.3b" in 1003. but th??t ley used in I00S. $53,3i7.S3 wort5-, ,hoino grown, while onlv $2S0O woly' tho outsido product was used. B j Using More Native Barlt$:!j In 1005, gl-l.tiG-l worth of the Or. used was of the outside producfcjtfflul 510 worth being native barloy3( following- figures .give the cousunfjj'f. of native and outside barley: "jlj.yrj. The value of tho malt ma'nufaaftjij; in the stale in 100S was $7G,436i(! G compared to $77,090 02 in 1005,-SoY malt purchased outside the statsi-Tr-i LOOS amounted to $11,070.90, nsvftli, pared with $2l.S75.IO in 1905. TETn. tal malt consumption in the stavt,! 1008 amounted to $107,307.71, as af' .0S,071.-12. Drink Bather Frcoly. IMS. lO&K.' Value of Utah bar- 1 ley used 5on.ni7.SS ?iSjfr - Value of other bar- W-j ley used 2.S00.00 15JB Ci Tim.-. Total value of ley used 35C.117.8I S6!Tjt, That tho people of l'tah drink'y rather freely is shown by the fatiffS?.. , 32.1 per cent of tho out nit was sS -tho state in 1908. leaving onlylF per cent to bo sold outside thojjfE-5?. The amount of tho local beer scp110 tho state in 1905 was -S0.2 pcrtf.1 however, indicating that beer dfif-p in Utah may be slightly on the deaf-'.1 "It is possible, of course." anwlf,"" Haines, 'that Utah is losing bil petite for beer." Wt", Tho total number of persons omw'!'11' in Iho breweries of the state iu'xa was 212, as against 10 in H)0ow' total amount of wages paid to ciw1?1-" in 190S was $221,740.12, whereas &fj $147,90G.3o was paid to emplojfc 1905. Tho average number 01 lijEV day employes were required ton .-.: in 'lOOS was S.7. as against S.o ia ; showing that tho work day is !jyr lengthened." The average 'iiun'bfZ., days each brewery operated in 190c 311, as agaiust 312 .in 1903. |