Show FAIR WILL CASE Snotty Problem is Still Par Prom Solution San Francisco May 14The jurors in the case of Angus vs Craven involving the Fair estate were excused today the entire time of the court being occupied with arguments In reference to the objection objec-tion of Mrs Cravens attorney that the photographic enlargements introduced by the plaintiffs are irrelevant The question ques-tion at Issue at the present stage is really sis to the ndmissibillty of evidence tending tend-ing to prove that the pencil will dated September 21 ISM is a forgery According to tH testimonyof Mrs Craven Cra-ven the will was drawn and read by Senator Fair whereuuon Mr Hasklns called his attention to the fact that it contained no provision for Mrs Craven I have provided for her in this way replied the senator and he produced the pencil deeds in question and gave them to her i The plaintiffs claim that the will Is apart a-part of the same transaction and really called to existence the deeds They maintain main-tain that evidence that the will is a forgery for-gery will tend to prove the deeds given at the same time ale forgeries They take the position that the will is fabricated evidence In supportof forgery Mrs Cravens Cra-vens attorney opposed the admission of the evidence on the ground that proof of one forgery by rt certain person Is not competent to prove another forgery by the same person Mrs Cravens attorney cited the Sharon case more than a year ago The attorney for the Fair administrators adminis-trators replied that the dear wife letters let-ters in the Sharon case were Introduced in court by photographic reproductions exactly in the same manner as photographic photo-graphic reproductions had been brought Into court in this case |