Show k I THE SUPREME COURT Reader Two Opinions Both Affirming Affirm-ing the Lower Court RIO GRANDE RIGHT OF WAY ITS BIGHT THROUGH PROVO CANYON IS VALID Edwin A Peck Will Get the Insurance Insur-ance J M Pepper Pound Mot i Guilty t of Burglary and silver J Hunter Not Guilty of Passing i 4 False Coin Trial of John Pot ill i For Criminal Assault Continued j Other Court Doings 9 Two opinions were yesterday handed down by the state supreme court In the case of the Rio Grande Western West-ern Hallway company vs the Telluride Power Transmission company L L Nunn and L Holbrook appellants the opinion which was written by Chief Justice Zane and concurred in by Justices j Jus-tices Bartch and Miner affirmed the i decree of the lower court The plaintiff alleged in its complaint that it was authorized to build a railway rail-way in Provo canyon on either of two routes described which were identical for the first 12 miles that it had located lo-cated and surveyed the right of way j for its railway over the land in dispute I dis-pute and was in actual possession J grading the same when the defendants I j under an adverse claim stopped the i j work by threats Judgment quieting title and awarding an injunction was I 1 j asked lr was admitted that the land was unsurveyed land of the United j I States Defendant Holbrook disclaimed any j I i interest in the subject of litigation but i united with the other defendants in denying plaintiffs right The other defendants answering further alleged possession and a right to dam the river and flow the canyon and the lands in question j The lower court decreed that the plaintiff lawfully appropriated the land in dispute and was in the actual possession pos-session thereof and that the defendants defend-ants had no right or title thereto and c issued an injunction restraining them from interfering with plaintiffs possession pos-session which the supreme court now affirmed |