Show K II JOIICH vs New York Life In the case of Ricy H Jones vs the k New York Life Insurance company t4f Chief Justice Merritt delivered the opinion affirming the order of the p lower court which was concurred In by Associate Justices Bartch and I King The plaintiff sued to recover 1500 t > o < d upon an insurance policy on the life I of Lewis H Jones The defendant answered that B H Jones and R D Jones each claimed the insurance money as administrators of the estate of Lewis H Jones that it fvas ignorant ignor-ant of the respective rights of the claimants that it was not in colluslon with either of them and asked to be permitted to pay the money into court and be discharged The defendant in pursuance of an order of the court I paid the money into court and was discharged and B H Jones an < LR D I Jones were permitted to interplead Plaintiff appealed only from the order permitting B H Jones and R D Jones to interplead and denying plaintiffs motion to strike out the answer as sham and irrelevant Thfe opinion says A n appeal from an order allowing parties to inter I plead is not allowed neither is an appeal I ap-peal from an order refusing to strikeout strike-out an answer They are not final judgments There is no reason shown to change the order of the court The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted |