Show IBEX MIKES IN COURT Question of the Priority of a 60000 Mortgage HELD BY MCORNICIC CO DECREE EKTEJRED IN BIINIXG SUIT OF MLAUGHLIN VS HIRSCIIMAN Damage Snit of Royce vs Salt Lnlie City Still Occupies Judge Streets Court Short Rulings by Both Judges Three leT Suits Pied in the State District Court The suit of the Sat Lake Lithographing Lithograph-ing company et al against the Ibex Mines and Smelting company came on before Judge Ritchie yesterday with MessrsStephens and Smith appearing for the plaintiff and Messrs F E Edwards Ed-wards C O Whittemore S H Lewis Richards Richards Frank Pierce P L Williams Sam King N W Son V Moyle and nedecker J H Moyle O W Mole William McKay representing the de vendants and various intervenors The facts are that W S McCornick Co advanced to the company the sum of 60000 and took a mortgage on the mines and smelter and other property prop-erty of the company to secure these the-se Seme time after the execution of the mortgage the Salt Lake Lithographing Litho-graphing company and other creditors fo the Ibex compo brought suits to recover the amounts owing them and attached tJhe mortgaged property claiming that their cams took precedence dence of the mortgage Some of these claims were for la < hor others for material ma-terial lO which mechanics lens wc e claimed while McCornick Co urged that their mortgage took precedence of all other claims The hearing was proceeding when the hour of adournmenit arrived I will Ton resumed at 9 oclock this morning and it is expected will be concluded b 10 oclock so that the MairlonGeyser case I may be taken up at that hour I |