| OCR Text |
Show h Compliance 1 ;oi 1937 Explained i Msis upon which compliance 931 agricultural conserva-wul conserva-wul be determined for '-?f J own or operate more fU in a county has been K to a letter received at the 0 the AAA from in oIf Fxrre", director of the fet division. Director William glas in charge of toe program ve- 'state announces. 5 tffavthe program will apply T t o here more than ne at : ;Med or operated by a per- -'.'-jii as follows: iiirl. '1T person who intends to file hirl. ,Ltion for payment under ar.4 ' agricultural conservation t n '4 m a particular county must men under such application all on-, "'. toth diversion and nondiver- :Thich such person owns or mt ::jtes in that county. In deter -;enes 1 , diversion payment to be httT Te' to an applicant in a county, fee!' ""consideration will be given to eher 'i diversion effected on nondiver- 7 farms. However, where there increase in the acreage of CrBet Dieting crops on nondiversion '0Uns Vsuch farms will thereupon ''m :J classified as diversion farms . . -vre such increase is in excess of mo, -soil-depleting base, or 20 acres, adetu aever is the larger, and such lota wiU tat consider" e cast determining the net pay-iggles' pay-iggles' at tor diversion on all diversion : -figar beet payments must be Rs iied on each farm without regard :ceived s ajar beet operations on other .erican :as, and the computed payments July 9, !:; the individual farms will mere-opes- :- be summarized on the multiple Venti- miication. lie class n payment to be made a an applicant in a county will be sauted with respect to all farms tfT or Perated by such aPPli ait in that county. Notwithstand-r Notwithstand-r i; toe fact that no soil-building office ;atices 're carried out; in 1937 on l a de er'!'n arms owne or operated by re i; applicant, such farms must be n. :itded under the appliiation for as sub- !' determine the appli-led appli-led the 6l!s slMre of diversion payments, if fice ot s 11 Payments, and soil-building m July L-,saace & o51 county." n |
