OCR Text |
Show i NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOK UNITED STATES PATENT UNITED STATES LAND OFFICE, OF-FICE, Salt Lake City, Utah, Ma. 21, 1945, U. S. MINERAL SURVEY NO. 7200. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVES that In pursuance of an Act ol Congress, approved May 10, 1872 COLUMBIA IRON MININO COM PANY, a corporation of Utah, b and through Its agent, attor ney-ln-fact, E. S. O'Connor, whos' I post office address is 1002-6 Kearn Building, Salt Lake City, Utah, ha. made and filed an application for a United States patent for the PINTO NO. 25 LODE MINING CLAIM, situate within the Pinto Iron Mining District, in Iron County, Coun-ty, Sate of Utah, and described by the official plat and field notes on file in this office and there desogn-ated desogn-ated as Mineral Survey No. 7200, said lode mining claim being sUu ate in the Northwest Quarter am the Southwest quarter of Sectlor 35, Township 3G South, Range 14 West, Salt Lake Meridian, the ex terlor boundaries of said Mineral Survey No. 7200 being described with magnetic declination of 14 leg. 30 mln. to 17 deg. 30 mln. East is follows: Beginning at Corner No. 1 of said 'Pinto No. 25 Lode Mining Claim. U. S. Sur. No. 7200, from which the quarter corner for Sections Sec-tions 34 and 35, Township 36 South, Range 14 West, Salt Lake Meridian ars South 51 deg. 31 mln. 30 sec West 671.6 feet; thence South 0 deg. 51 East. Variation 15 deg. 30 min. East, 1499.2 feet to Corner No. 2; thence North 89 deg. 13 mln. East, Variation 17 deg. 30 mln. East, 600.0 feet to Corner No. 3: thence North 0 deg. 51 mln West Variation 15 deg. 00 mln. East. 1499.2 feet to Corner No. 4; the'nee South 89 deg. 18 mln. West, Var iation 14 deg. 30 mln. East, 600.0 feet to Corner No. 1, the place of Teglnnlng. Expressly excepting and excluding exclud-ing from the above description the areas In conflict with said lode mining claim, to wit: Burke No. 2 Lode Mining Claim U. 8. Lot No. 57. Burke- No. 3 Lode Mining Claim i U. S. Lot No. 58. excepting that I part of said Burke No. 3 Lode Mining Claim that conflicts with Burke No. 2 Lode Mining Claim. U. S. Lot No. 57. Pinto No. 5 Lode Mining Claim, U. S. Sur. No. 4299. excepting that part of jRnld Pinto o. 5 Lode Mining Claim that conflicts with the Burke No. 3 Lode Mining Claim. U. S. Lot No. 58. Burkhorn Lode Mining? Claim U. S. Sur. No. 4909. . leaving a net area claimed and applied ap-plied for In this application of 13.762 acres, more or less. . The lode mining claims mwrest adjoining said Pinto No. 25 Lode Mining Claim. U. S. Mineral Survey Sur-vey No. 7200. as shown by the official of-ficial plat of survey, are as follows: fol-lows: Burke No. 2 Lode Mining Claim. U. 8. Lot No. 57. Burke No 3 Lode Mining Claim U. 8. Lot No. 58. rinto No. ft Lode Mining Claim U 8. Sur. No.. 4299. Buckhom Lode Mining CUlm. U. 8. Sur. No. 4909. X direct that this notice be published pub-lished In the Iron County Record, at Cedar Cly. UUh, a weekly news-paper news-paper and the newspaper published publish-ed nearest said mining claim, once each week for nine consecutive weeks. SCOTT P. STEWART. Register. Dickson, Ellis, Parsons it McCrea. Clalmant'i Attorneys, 1002-6 Reams Building. Salt Lake City 1, Utah. First Publication May 24. 1945. Last Publication July 11 1941. |