Show Albert Edward Wiggam I IA I A Fascinating the me Noted A. Author of L Your Mind I P Lets Let's t s Explore IASU e WIth The Fruit of the Family Tree 1 DO OU TH K MEW CAJoE H E INDUCED To i I I THEIR BEST EFFORTS I WITHOUT v. v I I THE E PROFIT MOTIVE I 1 I I 1 II ii i w fk I I ARE jiw II PRIMITIVE I PEOPLe LEE STRICT A A. c. c NCe CLUB o ThEIR E WOULD PEOPLE COMMIT CRt CRIME E EI MORALITY A I IF F THEY HAD D FULL z THAW CIVILIZED mE VW PEOPLE 6 P 7 E. E CR JO E OR ORUO Author Authors Note These answers are given chen from the scientific point of view Not all aU moral questions question tan can be answered with absolute scientific accuracy but no decision as to what is morally right Is b possible without science Science puts puls the the rights of organized society above bovo the ri rights of Individuals L I. Yes Professor Henry Pratt Fairchild sociologist po points out that hardly anyone except a 3 few ew financiers financiers finan inane ciers and employers work for profit Tea Teachers technicians who operate all allour our Industries all in business bus busi nc ness and industry all government etc work end give ive their best on fixed salaries Most people work for their families homes love of the work adventure honor J power pow pow- er cr etc and many other motives The profit motive is only a minor incentive to most human effort 2 Far more more strict Professor I Dunlap la m his I. I Civilized d Life says No evidence has been found that a primitive stage of promiscuity ever existed any any- where The facts con concerning the lower animals arc are all against such an assumption He thinks monogamy monogamy monogamy mo mo- mo- mo was the earliest form of marriage Strict S sex morals have characterized all earlier stages of civilization and loose sex morals moraIs all high periods of culture such as the great periods of Babylon Greece Rome Elizabethan England etc A Asad Asad Asad sad comment on so called culture and human progress v 3 Any answer is a matter of opinion ion but I te ice feel very p positive they e would not because a lull full knowledge of consequences would require a degree of intelligence as well as mindedness an an understanding of at human relationships so profound that crime would be out of the ques ques- tion If by full knowledge is merely merely merely mere mere- ly meant the knowledge they will bring distress to others and maybe mabe be hanged themselves I do not think these act as very great deterrents deter deterrents rents of ol crime The chief things that prevent crime arc are the moral and social social social so so- cial habit patterns and emotional controls con con- trots built up in childhood 1 Copyright John F F. Due Dill Co Col 4 |