OCR Text |
Show y IliiS 1-p's' .. '.j'"1" . -;trUl"t nuvtiiijr '"' TT1'111 ''"""I.V iihil Provo ,jl v commissioners. jl.nvi'V.'r (ho problem will still exist so far a other cities are ncoiiu'd and they will bo pxpee.t-,-,) to devise some plan of pollution pollu-tion control, It was stated. Sprins'vlllo and Aniorioan Fork .,ui petitioned alonjr with Provo, for the county wide district and this city wl,h American Kork has ,,j;roed to withdraw their requests. It" was foil thafthe plan outlined wouM never met a sufficient number num-ber of people's approval to be carried car-ried on. A major isue of disagreement on the county-wide plan was the ven 1tho,;"h,Ximi,m 'P clause' o;ievedm3dofithefPlan 1 't lour-mill escane clanco P to'Vh' WHl"d entuSfly pay o ,i ;tT'ml Lehi endorsed e condlt''naly providing the tax levy was kept at ono-milf All cities in the county con fronted with the sewage disposal problem, will be expected to? M X on on" d0Visin? a Ptan of -solution. Otherwise Provo's efforts ef-forts will not be successful in PJgconditiona'in Utah Lake it was indicated. |