OCR Text |
Show iirafiT iicwiini Young Man Equally Guilty With' Diggs, According to the Facts Developed. SAN FRANCISCO. Auc. 20. The trial of P. Dre-.v Cainlnetti rolled swiftly for-v.'anl for-v.'anl today in the groove worn for It by triul Immediately preceding or Maury wisps, convicted of the same charses. Mq- witnesses and the evidence of the government were with few exceptions identically thc same: the testimony was almost tho same. and. so far as could be Jiidgcd, the tactics of the defense were the same. Marsha Warrington had the stand for tne greater part of the day and her testimony testi-mony went to show that Camlnottl was thinly 01 nsaissunt- in transporting her nnrt Lola N'orrla from Sacra incnto to Ucno. in violation of the Mann white siavo traffic act. nnd that he persuaded, Induced and ontlced them to go. -I ho witness said she liad been a pure Bin until she mot Dlgrs5. Her fall had laKen place. In Dlggs's suite of offlceo, after champagne had been served there. Laminettl and Miss Norrls wero in an Rujolnlng room .it the time. Line of Defense. 1. . crf?rt of ln defense was to prove Jiiat Camlnettl had played a passive part, une paafago of the cross-examination is representative of its whole trend. nH le mcetlng between Dlgg3, Caml-e-..1'8? Norrls and yourself on the -atl rday before you left for Reno the which you two girls agreed to ri r did all the tAlklng- ami Mr. uaminettl aat by and n-recd to evcrj'-JlvK evcrj'-JlvK ,b?" kplng quiet. Is that the way jou wish to be understood?" or; 9amlnettl agreed to everjthlnfr." But he agreed passively, did he not?" ;., TH, t,le court Interrupted. ,A ,l,.J'0l'' theoo'. Mr. Howe." asked n-i.Bf ,Van Fleet' "at Mr. CamlnotU ns tnkon along also?" Passive Part Theory. r,'l?iur . lheory la, your honor, that Mr. ihi"6?',1 llfld "othlng to do with taking jneso girlB to Reno. The party went and iLa ??t.aJonB w,th wo flon't con-thn? con-thn? hRt he war' abducted, but we hold rrh. h?"" of certain conditions, that fulJL of f0l,r rUIlri it necessary to leave nrn, ,me.nt0 without delay and took the tlon." wll,,out regnrd to Us destina- mnRhJl5l U1.'8 contention was the testl-f"n,Y.,0.f., testl-f"n,Y.,0.f., Mlo,s Warrington today that thl i?ultl h,nd. frnlshcd the money for to tndJnat he had piven !20 of it a Norris. out of which sho should In I, Passage. In this statement, and nott r,eI,ont3d affirmations that Caml-P?onJuMd Caml-P?onJuMd MSree-5.to vcrything Dlggs had propoacd. the witness wai5 not tdinkcn. hor tnrt- Who.,.' thc stor' dniwh rrom sho t i",,LJcss lnt0 dc,a than when Kov.rn,t.the tlmc' Counsel for the Bn"mcul, ?vtl ,norc consldnnito, and h-ii-A brlc renlroct exmlnatlon shall glrVs nrfin ,fll,,.W ncxt Tuesday, the will J,rikal wl ho over. Lola Norrln ta,ow hor nn ll,e stand. I lomorrow there is tin session of court |