| OCR Text |
Show I! MOTHER CHAPIEB III MILL FAMILY HI Cross-Complaint Is Filed in Which Judgment for $2808 Is Asked, j Another emptor in the family row be- tween Thomas 13, Noall and bis brother- ! In-law and sister, . II. Scllwood and Ada Noall Solwood, was brought to light j Thursday In the district court, when ! Mr. anil Mrs. Scllwood filed an answer and cross-complaint to the action filed against them by Noall. Jn his complaint. com-plaint. Xoall asl;ed Judgment for ?500, the proceeds of the sale of a. house owned by him In Michigan, and also for 11. the value of a lpunge. which he alleged th Sellwoods had appropriated to their own use. In their answer, It Is admitted by the Sellwoods that they sold the house mentioned, men-tioned, but they allege that it belonged to Mrs. Grace B. Noall, the mother of Noall and Mrs. Sellwood, and that under un-der tho law of Michigan Noall was only entitled to an equal portion of the proceeds pro-ceeds of the sale along with the other heirs. His share would amount to only S10S. and It Is alleged that Noall authorize author-ize Mr. and Mrs. Sellwood to apply that money on the expensi-s of keeping his child and for moving to Salt Lake, where they were to keep house for him and board him and both of his children, chil-dren, j The couch, It Is alleged, was for the use of the child, who resided with the Sellwoods. In the cross-complaint It Is alleged that I Noall Is Indebted to Sellwood and IiIb wife In the sum of 1800 for boarding his son for a period of fifteen years, and in the further sum of fGiiO for board for himself him-self and both of his children during a po-I po-I rlod of eleven months since the Sellwoods I came to Utah. Judgment Is therefore 'I asked against Noall for the loUiJ sum of 5 $2S0fi. |