Show S all LEA TARIFF FAVORED I Position of All Senatorial iued4 Candidates Excepting One J ext NO REDUCTION IN THE DUTY All Are of Opinion That Lowering of Lead Tariff Would Result i More ay Injury Than Good Promise to See That the Law Is Not Evaded R3 publican County Committee Will lItt Support Carbis and Standish in j U IP Contests Applicants for Legislative Legisla-tive JobsNew Member in Town II r When tho Legislature met in 1S9D Mr LtI1 William F James president of the Producers association sent Utah Ore l > nsoca tL to each candidate for United States Senator three questions as follows1 = Flrst IC elected to the Senate will I vote and our influence I you first give your IUd your I b fluence to prevent the repeal of the present duties on lead in the Dlngloy prcsent duLcs i tariff 49 fJ4 Second Will you do all In your power V4VAA pow-er to enforce 3 strict payment oC tho Vtd7 duly as fixed by law on all lead imported SNOErA im-ported Into the United States I Third When the Intent of the law Is evaded by some technical construction or department ruling will you use your f every effort and exert your Influence to correct the condition existing and lw to secure favorable ruling or to amend the law 1 THe questions and answers were pub 110 b lished In The Tribune There was bu tone rQ t-one frank and fair and intelligent answer an-swer In the whole company That was by Judge Powers THREE MORE ASKED The occasion for the same questions and two or three more Is quite as pertinent per-tinent now as it was two years ago I hence The Tribune yesterday presented 7 the same questions to the various candidates can-didates togpthcr with three others S which are made necessary by the somewhat 1 some-what changed conditions and tho apparent ap-parent direction which legislation on Q this subject will take The added questions ques-tions arc these tons Would you advocate a decrease oC CE OF II the duty now on lead In the hope of building up trade with any country or iu can gct to promote what Is commonly called ty than fr reciprocity I re vauntlnjtj Do you or do you not believe that isk is a cocj the building up or benefiting of any industry ter that yc in-dustry In the United States by lowering We fully Ui tho present tariff duty on lead In any I you In ever form small or great will be of much glad to han more Injury to the lead miner and general have to o < gen-eral public than the corresponding prompt att benefit would be to the general public In your opinion should any reduction whatever in tariff duties on lead take I Jewel place or should lead in any form or through any cause be admitted Into 170 A the United States under a lower tariff than is fixed by the Dingley law p alin Put Theso questions In the order given above were submitted to each of the I aeven ayowed candidates for the Sen atorshlp Only one Thomas Kearns 5 declined to answer them Mr Kearns said When we are elected we will have time to give to those questions I shall always vote with my party OFCANDIDATES The gentlemen who answered the nr1c questions were Messrs Thomas Salisbury JUM J Salis-bury Cannon McCornlck Brown and Fitch Each of these gentlemen answered c an-swered tho three questions originally propounded by tho Ore Producers association as-sociation In the affirmative IJ E H Each oC the candidates answered V V JJ no to the question regarding advocacy r advoca-cy of the decrease of the duty on lead the outpotifi to promote reciprocity All of them declared against the admission of lead Cs 4n in any form into the United States under un-der a lower tariff than that fixed by the Dinglcy law The fifth question regarding the 6 benefits or injuries to be accrued from O O lowering the present tariff duty on S lead was answered as follows Coy Thomas In my opinion the per non first entitled to protection is the before b lead miner and producer and I will work to that end If elected Mr Salisbury Tho injury which t of 350 Y would result from lowering the present SILK AND tariff duty on lead would In the mining andsomesl C j States at least be greater than any corresponding benefits to other Indus were tries or to the general public Mr CannonIn our own section of d country tho injury to the lead miner Yard r Y ar I and general public would certainly be 1 1 much greater than any benefit thru would accrue to other Interests by reduction re-duction in the tariff referred to ome silk ad Col Fitch It will be of more Injury nd other I am In favor of maintaining the present pres-ent duties on lead wool and beetroot f h 50 to i sugar I ExSenator BrownI believe lower Yard ing tho tariff would injure the miners r and not benefit the public I am opposed op-posed to any reduction in the lead tariff I am In favor oC the strict enforcement en-forcement of the law without any abatement under any name iT CL1i 1 Mr McCornlck believe lowering II jLL 1 the tariff would he more inurlous to the miners than it would be beneficial to any one else |