Show CASES ARGUED GiCSK Co vs Groesheclc and Others Oth-ers Argued and Submitted F E Gregg Co vs Hyrum Groes beck Nicholas H Groeslbeak Henry I Ryan Alexander Wood and P H I Rasohe defendants Henry 11 Ryan I appellant from the TSurd distrlc t I count Hon S A Merritt judge was the first case to come up for orgumen I in tihe supreme court yesteiday morning morn-ing Ryan was repre5 ned fry Anderson Ander-son Anderson aId for tihe respondents I respond-ents Frank B Stephens appeared After Af-ter hearing the arguments their fiion ors took it under advisement Suit was originally brought to recover recov-er from the two Groegibecks the sum of 1750 due upon a promissory note Which was endorsed by Messrs Ryan Wood and Rasohe The defend an Ryan fed a demurrer ito the comiplain wihiclh was overruled by consent o jfche i parties he being allowed twenty days to separately answer Herein heal I he-al gM that the note sued upon > wa sold and delivered to the plaintiff by I the codefendant Rasche tout that prio to this Ryan especially instructed I Rasohe IQiat in case the labter should I transifer itSre note foe should craze a1s I Ryans name from the back of it as I an endorser that this was promise but inadvertently overlooked I m further set forth that at the time th note was transferred by Rasehe ihe expressly ex-pressly informed plaintiffs of hIs agreement Plaintiff tihen moved to strike Ryans i answer from the files as a sham and for judgment on the pleadings Tlh e I court granted tihis and entered judgment judg-ment ajgains the defendant Ryan in I the rainst 200445 with costs taxed at SD20 |