Show IX TIIE SUPREME COURT Arguments on the Wilson Writ of Hahcas Corpus Arguments were made before the supreme court on the Avrit of ihabeas corpus in the case or TV W Wilson now s rIng an eight years term In the penitentiary on eight convictions for grand larceny cattle stealing I Attorney S P Armstrong msde the argument for the petitioner otating j that WJlson was convicted on eight I separate indictments in the year 189 I and sentenced to a years Imprisonment Imprison-ment in each case the sentences to be cumulative Counse held that such sentence was wrdngitn law and that the eight sentences should run concurrently con-currently United States DiStriiot AttornGj Judd opposed the moon and took an opposite view to that of Mr Arm stroTig After hearing the argument their honors took the matter under advisement ad-visement I |