OCR Text |
Show VACATION IS PLANNED BY THE COURT H Judge Harris this morninp an Hj nounced. that be would tako his sum- Hj mer vacation in August and that ho Hj desired the attorneys to conform 10 H that plan by selecting only urgent H cases to place on the trial calendar H for the July term. There are many H more cases on the culondar than can M bo possibly beard during the Julj H term and the August vacation will H mean the accumulation of numerous H cases for the September term of H The following casea were set for H trial in the July term, tho understand- H Ing1 being that the term is to open H July 10, at which time a jury will be H on band: M J. A. Smith et al. vs. the Orphoum H Amusement company et al., July 11 H W. J. Rutledge vs". William Bow et H al., July 20. H Wallace A. Jenno ct al. vs. 6. M. H Robinson, July 12. H Swcn Matson vs. Bertha Matson, j July 27. H Frank Krase vs. Denver & Rio H Grande Railroad company, July 25 B Harriet Greenwell vs. James Pin- H gree, administrator, July 13. H James A. Stanley, vs. James Pingree, RRfl hdmlnistrator, uly 17. j L. R. Eccles vs. W. S. Hamilton, et H al., July is. H Cases belonging to the June term RH were set for hearing as follows: H Reese vs. Oregon Short Line Rall- j road company, July 3. RRa Cragun. vs.'Cragun, July 10. RRal Berrctt vs. Berrett, June 30. H Tho court stated that the Morgan H term of court would be held July 5. Ha and that the balance of tho month of H Hub' would be given entirely to the H hearing of cases in tho Ogden divis- H ion of the court. H The divorce cuse of Bertha Carr H against Robert Carr was dismissed on H motion of the plaintiff's attorney. The H. matter has been settled out of court H A hearing on an "order to show cause Hj , "was to have been heard this morning |