Show DIVORCES IN UTAH I Scent d for lor 1 I 5 Shunts Shows They Tier Were cie ti J Per Cent of Marriages Despite Despie divorce laws that rime aie do do- clam 1131 ed cd to be he lax th tIme Iho nUl number of di divorces tl- tl granted In lii Utah CLaim in 1 1905 O was Avas only 9 per pel cent cent of tho the nUl number cI of marriages es that took look place c during that year ear car according to figures complied compiled by h Froth Fred Price state commissioner of statistics sta sta- Tho total number of or marriages mar mal was against H 2 divorces In Jim view luw of or tIme Iho claim of oC divorce anti advocates that divorces 11 In iii tIme the country coun COUI- COUI try ty at large amount in number to l-l l 1 tier lieu CI cent cent of If the tho lw marriages Utah's CLaims showing last year is regarded as excellent ex ex- Gln Grand Iron Rich antI and Sun Han Juan countes had no divorces dug t Iho o year Tho Time figures h by counties countes are arc given hen below with l Kane lano ano count county eliminated because e no repot report I has been received recel ed from that county yet yut M Mar Mar- ur r- r I ec ces Beaver 3 3 Box Elder C f DI 91 3 Cache i If j Carbon Calbon 15 15 70 iG DavIs I. I 5 G Emory 0 1 1 to H 1 32 OJ Grand v ll lo lion Ion i 23 J Juab ua I i- i o i u Ii K Millard I 2 16 G Morgan o. o an 3 17 Pluto 1 1 r 1 IS Rich i. i I 12 1 Salt Sail Sai l Lake e I 19 it loj San Saum Juan j. j 1 I ir n h J. J c v T f. f 1 11 SJ Summit 1 11 I focy f. f l' l 1 I Sj n 7 Utah CLaIm 1 l J 31 ViV 1 t G 51 I i ft Washington 5 I CO G Galo Wayne alo 1 1 d 1 1 |