Show Of I TAlK I r Prohibition Advocate Advocat Opponents Views on to Mailer Matler E Exp f I f I Advocates of prohibition sent their suggestions oa ton prohibition im but to the lit committee on agriculture tion at 7 o'clock this e senate chamber room ta county building will wiil be heard it at if 7 t 0 f Friday evening in the tha sa 41 A 11 fight ht on the referendum q expected this e evening wh cates of prohibition appear j senate committee on ri fixation a ion to discuss the tho pu public nubile hear hearing ns for those Who fIT fir wilt will be hell held in is i tk chamber room Ol city u f building beginning at 7 o 0 c evening Public ij the tho opponents opponent of same samo hour bour and in the tho sane pla pIatt c evening It is understood there r hon tion of tho 41 drs to lt t sage sare of Ute the Wootton biR enact prohibition without ref rei question to the people y of tho the legislature h who vhs ari art arg tho the prohibition cause H to refer reter the tho question to tofu tithe the state for popular vote ott Tt nel bers hers it is said will object t to ik tU ton bill Opp Oppose Referendum Chin Senator See chi a agriculture and irrigation oD and leader of the upper house declarer the co i ithe the Federation of Better Bett tt l 1 will strenuously oppose the is 1 a referendum clause laus in the bill I arc aro satisfied that a would mako snake tho the bill al Wootton of Utah county county f eli the bill is also aho of tb toll th i. i Some of the tho prohibitionists for tor resolution calling a 0 amendment providing for J ro However Howo a 8 constitutional would require a two-thirds two nt nii houses and antI prohibitionists ai sri are r whether the they could win so bit t e jonty to their side The pro l further contend that a IIi tl people of Utah are tion and that tho the i l cs amendment c warranted delay It l I Ilk prohibitionists estimate t. pratt vears years before prohibition into effect if i the tha Ic Iff It passed a prohibition amp v proposition could coull not be ba w until the tho next general el lie r fall of 1 1016 16 No Public Discussion Some of tho the dry I. I tend however that the p. p it constitutional amendment er r would effectually and tb the tho prohibition matter They i that where prohibition is is net constitutional amendment W Ike i coming for or a E is constantly up wj reaction costing costin the interest H Has liquor and leaving lea as to the future futuro They a constitutional 1 placed on the boo books s there w question on in the minds mIndS' of ol W how bow long Jono Utah would column olumn only from frog tC t Discussions wilt will b 1 favor prohibition thou T Friday night only heard bean I will mil be tic prohibition tie the u de declares bres want public de a HI t not any is simply w n that ter-that that ter t from those who aro arc inter |