| Show THE PAY DAY IN THE COURTS A franklin avenue mansion in litigation IDE DE WOODY AND as a complicated case involving an important law point lunsted states i sued claims of nam session the abo irr dyer estate i 4 settled i in n probate court philo E P joac To suit for divorce IH I 1 I 1 f a place piece ot of property on ry anklin avenue formed the toasts basis of the only important matter which earn camo 0 IF before judge merritt tn ln the third als os court th plaintiff was 5 finn J pembroke the th defendant J T p de woody and various phases s of 0 4 1 l j aft action have iwon been aired in court dury durs ing ag the past few anon months t he in december 1193 certain judgments having been rendered herbert rem pembroke broke husband of 0 uio the present an nd av it the ali then reputed owner ot of tho the prop arty the some same was waa sold and mrs hrs pen 1 iro broke ur ohad it later de woody a judgment derment ju walnut Iem Ilera broka broke binl asand asked ked that tie lie lie be permitted 0 to o re sa yerem the property I 1 VM stra pembroke and rid t the tha sheriff refused to recognize mn I 1 do and he be then began mandamus roan damus proceedings ft to compel tho the officer to him eur ax a the th a court bound in do woodys favor find and V mr rs 4 pembroke retaliated by beginning elms liar proceedings against this abit sheriff and i rio a woody A demurrer demur to this action I 1 was wa sustained ned and mrs lira then began injunction proceedings against T de woody to prevent him front from atte attempting ampt to collect tho the rents and al alno me set ft I 1 up that tho t when she purchased the property it rop it the sheriffs a sale bale tier ill husband is band deeded ithol W entire interest to her fora sum and therefore prayed I 1 lial lier ter title to the property bo be quieted l f 1 w 18 kanst frist do de woody ahrn the mattor roat tr was called up yosh erdag I 1 iho 0 defendant daf jdant who was I 1 lepart pre mard roomed b by F mchardy JUc hards rich chardi A rde ar ml er d J if darm danny Y filed an setting sellin ff up in balf that since the grit actton on to to q quirt dint had iona hwn tied nied the plaintiff had lidid him 1540 the amount ot of the claim thereby lils ills rights as aa a re dempt loner abie being done the hie defendant insist cd that there thare was nothing before the court iribe be IS litigated til rated and asked that tho the action bo be dismissed sutherland ilowit ard and co 0 whit ter acmore nore for the plaintiff ionic an appo we rite view of the case cae hoil vever and askea that a decree be ent entered red sred quietly 9 thir th ir title its as against do de Ilo woody loody the tha was figued at so corae tie length and was filla Is s a very pretty law point in vol tho the plaintiff holds that As aa 0 li V evsy s claim has bren been settled bottled bh ah a s entitled tto to a deer decree quieting her ber title lille ergile re do woody ho hol da that by the payment to him of 0 the taw IM the plaintiff admitted that the allegations of her were untrue and that sh she e Is clearly not entitled to it a decree lie he f or ther elves it out that he has other balms against pembroke and wu int filst in unto that the transfer of the property to sim was to defraud his creditors creditor and it the court quiets omen mis alis Pem brokes title he ha will trill inen have no redress OrD ORDERS in the caw case of 0 D F parsons vi VA john Vau bauchan glian ott et al judgment was a rendered tit in davir P of tile he by default Glai annl of italy was wa admitted 40 dab n I 1 by judo lie in the third district court yesterday ON aples forwarding Vs s E r Pao noo judgment in favor of plain III toi fol jall bank of commerce vs 1 I I 1 Start yuck et t ll il judgment in favor of plain plaintiff Alfr for john 0 miller co vs heber A smith judgment in favor ol of plaintiff for i 1 ir I 35 simon bros vs v heher heber A smith for plaintiff for J r F jack vs va 1 j I Reverl dge judg judar anent tor for plain plaintiff urr for |
