Show SUPREME COURT I Two Opinions Eancisd Down Prom the Bench Yesterday I The supreme court yesterday handed I down two opinions One in the case of C V Miles et al vs the Sheen Rock i ei1i An l Mining and Milling company appellants J appel-lants was written by Justice Earth j and concurred In by Justice Miner and i DiFtrict Judge Cherry and affirmed the j judgment of the lower court I The plaintiff made application for al receiitr for the defendant compaiy and for an injunction to restrain the directors of the corporation from proceeding I oni tc i nPr ceeding to collect t an assessment on he capital stock In this ase Frank Pierce K C Barton C W Morse I M Rig ley William Campbell and A Hanauer were the dirertors and they were temporarily tem-porarily restrained from collecting the assessment and in the meantime a new I uoaru 01 aireciors was uieciea wnicn levied a new assessment and rescinded the fcrmer one although a number of the shareholders had paid the first assessment as-sessment The supreme court held that the injunction was properly granted by the lower court and affirmed its judgment judg-ment An Irrigation Case The < < other opinion was in the case of the Nephi Irrigation company appellant appel-lant against Samuel T Vickers in which the opinion was written by District Dis-trict Judge Hart and concurred In by Chief Justice Zane and Justice Miner The suit was brought to uiet title to all of the waters of Salt Creek In Juali county and its tributaries Hop creek and Rock Springs and to enjcin the defendants from interfering with any of the waters of said streams The court below found that the defendant was entitled to sufficient water to irrigate irri-gate 31 acres of land 1 The supreme court directed that the W lower court should modify the decree i by finding either from the evidence r talten or irom otner eviasnre that maybe may-be offered or from the report c f a referee ref-eree the exact amount of water in miners inches that will be sufficient to irrigate the defendants 31 acres and for his culinary and domestic purposes and the case was remanded for that purpCse Short Orders L C Larsen vs Royal Insurance company com-pany settled and dismissed W It Maione vs Southern Pacific railway rail-way dismissed R B Shepard vs Leslie E Keeley ct al dismissed at plaintiffs cost Thomas Snowden vs P V Coal company com-pany defendant allowed till July 21 to prepare and serve statement on motion for a new trial Wm Fowler vs P V Coal company same order John Jj Gray vs John S Groesbeck order made setting aside order striking case from calendar and case reinstated I |